Blog Tools
Edit your Blog
Build a Blog
RSS Feed
View Profile
« March 2009 »
S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30 31
You are not logged in. Log in
Entries by Topic
All topics  «
Decline of the West
Freedom's Guardian
Liberal Fascism
Military History
Must Read
Politics & Elections
Scratchpad
The Box Office
The Media
Verse
Virtual Reality
My Web Presence
War Flags (Website)
Culture & the Arts
The New Criterion
Twenty-Six Letters
Friday, 20 March 2009
Feminism's Anti-Utopia Provokes Giggles
Topic: Must Read

 

There are some books that demand to be read simply for the pathos of their stupidity. I was reminded of this while posting about the untimely death of Natasha Richardson—who, I noted, had starred in one of the worst movies of all times, The Handmaid’s Tale. And it was no surprise that the movie reeked, for the 1985 novel by Margaret Atwood was even more of a stinker.

 

Set in a future United States where religious fundamentalists have seized power, The Handmaid’s Tale pushes every progressive button on the ideological control panel, from anti-Americanism to radical feminism. Not that the idea of a fundamentalist dictatorship is necessarily a bad one. The science fiction writer Robert Heinlein used it to good effect in his 1953 novella, “If This Goes On…” But where Heinlein was primarily interested in telling an exciting story, Atwood was earnestly seeking to send a political message. Hence the general implausibility, swerving frequently into plain silliness, that permeates The Handmaid’s Tale.

 

The novel is worth reading, however, as a kind of social document. It offers an amusing glimpse into the kooky universe of radical feminism—though the realization that many people take such nonsense seriously is likely to alarm the discerning reader. And besides, though with no intention of being so, it's a funny, funny book.


Posted by tmg110 at 8:41 AM EDT
Post Comment | Permalink

View Latest Entries