Blog Tools
Edit your Blog
Build a Blog
RSS Feed
View Profile
« November 2008 »
S M T W T F S
1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30
You are not logged in. Log in
Entries by Topic
All topics  «
Decline of the West
Freedom's Guardian
Liberal Fascism
Military History
Must Read
Politics & Elections
Scratchpad
The Box Office
The Media
Verse
Virtual Reality
My Web Presence
War Flags (Website)
Culture & the Arts
The New Criterion
Twenty-Six Letters
Wednesday, 26 November 2008
Hope Amid the Ruins
Topic: Decline of the West

 

With good reason, the 2006-08 rout of the Republican Party has sent conservatism into a tailspin. On Inauguration Day 2009, the Marine Corps Band might as well play “The World Turned Upside Down.” Still, there’s one very good reason why conservatives can look to the future with confidence: Barack Obama and the Democratic Party will fail.

 

Anticipatory schadenfreude, you say? Perhaps, but consider my reasoning. We know already, from the historical record, that many of the policies espoused by Obama & Co. are unworkable. Indeed, they contradict themselves at every turn. Energy consumption will be rationed by government fiat (cap and trade), thus throttling economic growth, while Congress and the White House strive mightily to stimulate the economy by ballooning the deficit. Healthcare will be made affordable for all through a series of government mandates that will pile a huge new burden of regulation on a sector of the economy whose present problems derive from—an excess of regulation. Detroit automakers will be bailed out at taxpayer expense—and then required to manufacture “green” vehicles that few people are likely to buy. And so on.

 

When it comes to the economy, activist government represents plenty of downside potential. It would be extraordinarily difficult for the federal government to do anything at all that might actually foster economic growth. On the other hand, it can easily create economic havoc. Washington, D.C., is like the brontosaurus: vast bulk, tiny brain case and none too particular about where it places its feet. That is the sad reality that progressives have never been able to take on board—and it will sink them.

 

Of course, it’s always possible that President Obama will prove to be more of a pragmatist that his campaign rhetoric indicated. Some of the appointments he’s made so far point in that direction. But power is a highly addictive drug. And it causes hallucinations.


Posted by tmg110 at 2:33 PM EST
Post Comment | Permalink
Reality Check
Topic: Decline of the West

 

Progressives are watching with muted dismay as President-Elect Obama assembles his team. Though of course they’re nowhere near jumping ship, the lefty blogosphere and the Democratic Party base have growing reason to be ill content with their Messiah. Could he really be thinking of nominating the reviled Hillary Clinton as Secretary of State? Uh-huh. Is he truly thinking of asking Robert Gates to stay on as Secretary of Defense? Yup. Meanwhile, large chunks of his plan for the country, as presented during the election campaign, have been summarily discarded.

Well, duh. Since when has any “plan for the country,” generated for political purposes, ever really been translated into governing policy? To win a presidential election is to experience a sudden and frequently painful reality check. Obama may have charisma to burn, but that only opens the door to the Oval Office. It doesn’t help much once you’re actually seated behind the desk.

Of course, President Obama will try to enact bits and pieces of his promised progressive agenda. He’ll make some appointments that will give the lefty blogosphere a thrill up its collective leg. But with the economy in a tailspin and multiple foreign-policy challenges on the agenda, he’ll find it difficult to deliver on “change”—whatever “change” was supposed to mean.

 

Note, for example, how the president-elect has stepped back oh, so delicately, from his campaign pledge to abolish the ban on homosexuality in the armed forces. Now he says that he’ll “consult” with the senior military leadership before doing anything. Why is this? Probably because Obama recognizes that introducing so controversial a reform into the armed forces at a time when they’re fighting a couple of wars might not be such a good idea. He may also recall that by pushing that very issue, the Clinton Administration suffered an early and painful self-inflicted wound. Homosexuals represent 2% of the population. Why should Obama expend precious political capital on behalf of so tiny an interest group?

 

Wherever his ideological heart may lie, Barack Obama is for the moment behaving as a political pragmatist. Perhaps later on he’ll succumb to presidential hubris, but for now he seems determined to proceed with caution. It’ll be some time yet before progressives lose patience with their hero and begin to express full-throated dismay over the policies of his administration. Based on the course of the presidential transition so far, the winter of their discontent may blow in sooner than anyone expects.

Posted by tmg110 at 8:35 AM EST
Post Comment | Permalink
Tuesday, 25 November 2008
Waiting to Exhale
Topic: Decline of the West

 

Progressives like to boast that they’re the champions of science. Or perhaps I should render the word as SCIENCE, since one can practically hear the all-caps emphasis when a progressive pronounces it.

 

A cardinal item of progressivism’s indictment of George W. Bush was that he and his administration were “anti-science.” It occurred to me today that the charge is actually rather funny, coming from people who seek to classify as a pollutant a gas that human beings exhale with every breath, and without which no plant could survive.


Posted by tmg110 at 2:21 PM EST
Updated: Tuesday, 25 November 2008 2:26 PM EST
Post Comment | Permalink
Monday, 24 November 2008
Seriously, Though
Topic: Decline of the West

If you're a progressive, why are you so obsessed with the 1930s?


Posted by tmg110 at 1:08 PM EST
Post Comment | Permalink
Friday, 21 November 2008
Good Point, Barack
Topic: Decline of the West

Well, you can't say he didn't warn us:

"The real gamble in this election is playing the same Washington game with the same Washington players and expecting a different result." (Barack Obama, December 27, 2007)


Posted by tmg110 at 1:43 PM EST
Post Comment | Permalink
Thursday, 20 November 2008
Wither Change?
Topic: Decline of the West

 

There’s something familiar about the incoming Obama Administration, isn’t there? Well, the Bourbons had their Restoration, so I suppose that the Clintonistas are entitled to theirs.

 

Let me be clear: I don’t blame Obama for filling out his roster with the likes of Tom Daschle and Rahm Emanuel. First, since he won the election, he’s entitled to appoint whomever he wants. Second, he needs people who are familiar with the ways of Washington, and where is he to get them if not from the ranks of the last Democratic Administration?

What this does, show, however, that Obama’s constant harping on the string of “change” was so much careless plucking. By the time he’s finished, the Messiah will have chosen as his Apostles a grizzled band of recycled Washington insiders—with recycled policies from the past to match.


Posted by tmg110 at 6:54 PM EST
Updated: Thursday, 20 November 2008 6:55 PM EST
Post Comment | Permalink
Thursday, 13 November 2008
Obama's Mystery Science Theater
Topic: Decline of the West

Speaking as someone who contracted polio in 1955 (the same year in which the Salk vaccine was introduced—just a bit too late for me and many others, alas) I have a question for the incoming Obama Administration. How is it that, after all your pious denunciations of a Republican "war on science," you could possibly be considering the notorious anti-vaccination kook, Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., to head the Environmental Protection Agency? That his name has even been floated is a scandal and a disgrace. I'll remember this the next time I hear some progressive bloviating about "good science."

Personal note: I was lucky to make a full recovery from my bout with polio. Most people who contracted that terrible disease weren't nearly so fortunate.


Posted by tmg110 at 9:10 AM EST
Updated: Thursday, 13 November 2008 12:55 PM EST
Post Comment | Permalink
Tuesday, 4 November 2008
The Solitary Swan
Topic: Verse

 

He steps out into the smudged light and thinks:

Here’s a poor excuse for Christmas morning.

Clouds, pregnant bellied, gray as lunar dust,

Clot the sky—and of the snow there remains

Nothing but a crust along the margins

Of the gutters. He looks back through the door,

To the kitchen, where the coffee’s perfume

And his wife’s voice woo him—but he is bound

To his purpose. He will run this morning.

And so he sets his face toward the river,

So crosses the yard, the street, and begins.

Within a hundred paces, he has lost

His sense of the day. This is just a dark

December morning—unremarkable—

Cold, foggy, bone-damp with the sickly wheeze

Of a half-hearted winter. Now he gains

The sluggish river. Trees along the bank

Lacerate the blank sky with bare branches.

The river is brown and flat. No bells throat

From the narrow steeples of the churches.

Alone on the path, he repeats aloud:

“Here’s a poor excuse for Christmas morning.”

Then he glances toward the river and sights

A swan.

Its neck poised in a graceful curve,

Its course serene, assured and absolute,

Its bearing masterful, as if aware

Of how its brightness stabs the runner’s eye.

They pace one another. Then the path turns.

Away, away—he sets his face against

The river now—fixes in memory

A picture of the solitary swan—

But he will not glance back.

Instead he listens for the Christmas bells,

Which soon, he thinks, must now pronounce their part.


Posted by tmg110 at 9:12 AM EST
Post Comment | Permalink
Thursday, 2 October 2008
A Willing Suspension of Disbelief
Topic: Decline of the West

Former Democratic Congressperson Cynthia McKinney, who is, hilariously, this year's Green Party presidential candidate, has accused the Department of Defense and the Louisiana Army National Guard of murdering some 5,000 prisoners in the days following Hurricane Katrina. The white devils who run Louisiana evidently took advantage of post-Katrina chaos to clean out the state's correctional system. Each prisoner is said to have been shot in the back of the head. The bodies were supposedly dumped into one of Louisiana's numerous swamps.

Two questions arise in connection with McKinney's charge. (1) Does she believe it? (2) Does anybody else believe it? I think that the answer in both cases is no.

It would be bad enough if the nation's conspiracy theorists—and their name is Legion, for they are many—actually believe their assorted fairy tales. But suppose they don't? In a way, that would be worse. Take Cynthia McKinney. She has no evidence to back up her story, nor does she seem interested in obtaining any. She has simply chosen to believe it.

It's possible, I suppose, to construct a scenario in which troops of the National Guard execute thousands of unarmed civilians. During World War II, few people in America and Britain could bring themselves to believe that the Nazis were actually bent on the physical extermination of European Jewry. Persecution, yes. Brutality, most certainly. But genocide? The mind boggled. Yet that was precisely what the Nazis were doing. Given the tragic history of the last century, prudence demands that even the most implausible charge of this kind be given a fair hearing.

Even so, most such stories have absolutely no basis in fact. The most that one can say of some of them is that they have a tenuous basis in reality. For example, while it is not true that the US government deliberately infected black men with syphilis in order to study the disease, it is true that they left a small number of previously infected black men untreated for the same reason.

But mostly (the Moon landings were faked, the CIA sold crack to inner-city blacks, etc., etc.) conspiracy theories are woven of whole cloth, and those who profess to believe them are completely uninterested in such inconvenient realities as a total lack of evidence. They cling to their fairy tales because fairy tales make them feel good. Large numbers of black Americans, for example, pretend to believe that the US government invented AIDS to kill off black people. They know it isn't true, but it's a convenient untruth. It buttresses an ideology of failure that lets black Americans blame their discontents and disappointments on anyone but themselves. Cynthia McKinney is simply providing them with another bedtime story.


Posted by tmg110 at 8:28 AM EDT
Updated: Thursday, 2 October 2008 9:25 AM EDT
Post Comment | Permalink
Tuesday, 23 September 2008
After the Harvest (Indiana Cornfield)
Topic: Verse

 

As a mother passes her hand

Over bed sheets, smoothing them out,

The coming snow will smooth this field,

Covering the broken stubble

Tomorrow, perhaps. But today,

A rearguard of the autumn sun

Retreats across the barren field,

Gilding the harvested bare earth

As if to stand against the fall of night—

But never turning from its westward flight.


Posted by tmg110 at 8:22 AM EDT
Post Comment | Permalink

Newer | Latest | Older