Blog Tools
Edit your Blog
Build a Blog
RSS Feed
View Profile
« February 2011 »
S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28
You are not logged in. Log in
Entries by Topic
All topics  «
Decline of the West
Freedom's Guardian
Liberal Fascism
Military History
Must Read
Politics & Elections
Scratchpad
The Box Office
The Media
Verse
Virtual Reality
My Web Presence
War Flags (Website)
Culture & the Arts
The New Criterion
Twenty-Six Letters
Wednesday, 2 February 2011
Sometimes Dated/Still Dangerous Visions
Topic: Must Read

 

Among the many good reasons for opposing the late, unlamented Equal Rights Amendment was the fact that Harlan Ellison was for it.

 

I discovered this historical factoid in the pages of Shatterday, an Ellison short story collection that came out originally in 1980. In various story introductions (he’s one of those writers who feels it necessary to provide authorial guidance to the reader), Ellison makes a point of mentioning that he was in Phoenix or Jersey City or East Overshoe, North Dakota, to speak at an ERA rally. How quaint that seems today, when it’s quite clear that the ERA was superfluous. But it did possess the virtue of making progressives like Harlan Ellison feel, well, virtuous.

 

If all this makes you think that I don’t like Ellison as a writer, let me correct the record. He wrote a number of stories that I greatly admire, among them “I Have No Mouth and I Must Scream,” perhaps my favorite paranoid fantasy of the computer age, and the iconic “A Boy and His Dog.” The stories in Shatterday don’t quite come up to that level, though several of them are pretty good. But turning the pages of this book got me to thinking about Ellison as a phenomenon, as he undoubtedly was in his prime.

 

In round numbers, Ellison has produced more than 1,000 short stories, novels, TV and film screenplays, etc. He edited a pair of groundbreaking SF anthologies, Dangerous Visions and Again, Dangerous Visions, that are still in print. Among his TV credits is the script for “Demon with a Glass Hand,” possibly the best episode of The Outer Limits. Whatever his defects of personality—abrasive, combative, thin-skinned—the man is one hell of a productive writer.

 

So what kind of a writer is he? Though Ellison published many stories that could fairly be described as science fiction, I think that he’s properly categorized as a contemporary fantasist. His best and most representative work, even when it makes use of SF conventions, presents a series of nightmare visions, not of the future, but of the present. Few of the stories in Shatterday could be described as SF. In this, I think, he bears some resemblance to the late J.G. Ballard—though the latter was a less conventional and more imaginative writer than Ellison.

 

I think, really, that the ERA thing is the key to understanding Harlan Ellison: He’s a Sixties guy. Like Stephen King, he never quite got over the Age of Aquarius. He allowed the Sixties to date him, and that in turn has dated a good deal of what he wrote. (See, for example, Stalking the Nightmare, a short story collection published in 1982 with a forward by…Stephen King.) And when it comes to politics, he's just plain tiresome, like some elderly Confederate partisan still fighting the Civil War.

 

But Harlan Ellison has been so prolific that a volume collecting his memorable stories would occupy a good two or three inches of shelf space. That’s not a bad record for any writer, this side of Shakespeare.


Posted by tmg110 at 3:58 PM EST
Post Comment | Permalink
Tuesday, 1 February 2011
There's No There There on Egypt
Topic: Decline of the West

 

All too predictably, the Obama Administration has received hosannas from the punditocracy for its supposedly deft handling of the crisis in Egypt—this despite Vice President Biden’s stupid and irresponsible claim, early on, that the Egyptian strongman, Hosni Mubarak, is not a dictator. Really, though, if you boil off all the goo and dribble, there’s not much cooking in the Messiah’s policy pot.

 

After trying really, really hard to ignore an earlier popular uprising in Iran, President Obama has scant credibility when he calls for democracy in Egypt. Observers in the Muslim world could be excused for concluding that the United States is a contemptible enemy and an unreliable friend. The Iranian regime (enemy) got treated with kid gloves. The Egyptian regime (ally) is being shoved under the bus. Go figure.

 

The Administration’s calls for democratic accountability and an orderly transition of power are similarly lacking in credibility. After heaping scorn on George W. Bush’s democracy agenda and sucking up to various despots, President Obama is poorly positioned to champion the democratic aspirations of the Egyptian people. In any case, it’s far from clear that the Egyptian people have any such aspirations. Most probably they’re just fed up with the government’s corruption and mismanagement of the economy, and would be glad to be ruled by a tyrant who’s less greedy and more efficient than Mubarak.

 

So what should President and his people have been saying since this crisis blew up? In four words: as little as possible. It’s better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to open one’s mouth and remove all doubt. It’s probably futile, however, to offer such advice to an administration that includes the inimitable Joe Biden.


Posted by tmg110 at 8:07 AM EST
Post Comment | Permalink
One Down, Two to Go
Topic: Must Read

I'm now about 100 pages into the second volume of Shelby Foote's splendid narrative history of the Civil War, so my literary New Year's resolution remains on track.

A thing that strikes me about the Civil War, now that I'm well into Foote's account, is the adamant nature of the struggle. I know already, in broad terms, what Foote will show me in detail as I turn the pages of his narrative: that our Civil War raged from the first battlefield to the last ditch, inch by desperate inch, ending only with the utter exhaustion of the Confederacy. Foote's narrative reveals something of what this meant in terms of blood and treasure. As President Lincoln noted in his second inaugural address, America paid a high price for the offense of slavery, an offense that was all the greater because it stood in such glaring contrast to the shining words of our founding documents.

The story of this lamentable conflict is revealing of certain aspects of the American character, among them a tendency toward stubborn, righteous anger that such people as Hitler and Tojo would have done well to consider. Elites in the media and the academy may tell themselves and one another  that prosperity and Vietnam have dissolved that hard kernel of the national character. I think not.


Posted by tmg110 at 7:45 AM EST
Post Comment | Permalink
The G-2 from Lexi
Topic: Freedom's Guardian

If you're puzzled by the title of this post, I know that you've never served in the Army. The G-2 is the intelligence officer on a general's staff. Hence "G-2," when used as a noun in Army demotic, means information, news, the good word.

Having translated that for you, I'm pleased to report that we Skyped with Lexi this weekend. Things remain pretty quiet in the 511th MP Company's area of operations. PFC Gregg is doing well and looking forwar to her mid-deployment leave, now little more than a month off. She promised to send some more photos soon.

Watch this space for more G-2 as it becomes available.


Posted by tmg110 at 7:38 AM EST
Post Comment | Permalink
Monday, 31 January 2011
Dream On
Topic: Decline of the West

 

It really is painful to watch know-nothings like Geraldo Rivera of Fox News as they bloviate about the dawn of democracy in Egypt. This morning, I heard him opine that, hey, if the Muslim Brotherhood is willing to “play by the rules,” there’s no reason why it couldn’t form part of a democratic Egyptian government.

 

To which I reply—humbug. The chances that revolution in Egypt will produce democracy hover somewhere between slim and none. At best, we may see the establishment of an authoritarian regime, run behind the scenes by the armed forces, tricked out with a few scraps of democratic window dressing. But if the Muslim Brotherhood emerges as a major political force in the new regime that’s coming, you can forget about democracy—if by democracy is meant individual liberty, freedom of thought, speech and worship, respect for the rights of minorities, political and cultural pluralism, etc. The Muslim Brotherhood embraces an Islamist dogma that, since it rejects all such things in principle, can hardly be expected to tolerate them in practice.

 

Anyhow, violent street demonstrations followed by disorderly elections are not likely to transform any such country as Egypt into a democratic state. Where no tradition of democracy exists, it can hardly be expected to emerge overnight. Where the foundational ideas on which a stable democratic order rests are rejected in principle, “democratic government” becomes an oxymoron.

 

I wish the Egyptian people well. But there’s no point in pretending that the revolution they’ve made will set them free.


Posted by tmg110 at 8:56 AM EST
Post Comment | Permalink
Thursday, 27 January 2011
Stupid Progressive Questions Answered
Topic: Liberal Fascism

A new feature, provided for the benefit of perplexed people on the Left:

Q: If we can send a man to the Moon, why can't we eliminate poverty?

A: We've eliminated polio, but we can't cure the common cold. Your point?


Posted by tmg110 at 8:35 AM EST
Updated: Thursday, 27 January 2011 8:18 PM EST
Post Comment | Permalink
Hardly a Rave Review
Topic: Decline of the West

 

Conrad Black on the President’s State of the Union address: The Disastrous SOTU. “The speech,” he opines, “was largely a tired porridge of the president’s old, time-warped pastiche of leftist postures from [Obama’s] university years.” Amen.

 

Black is a man who seldom finds himself at a loss for words, but he had to delve deeply into the lexicon for adjectives and nouns with which to denigrate the Obama SOTU: “groaning farrago of clichés,” “listless,” “oppressive vagueness,” “credibility gap,” “hallucinatory vision,” “spirit of declinism.” By the time Black was finished, the SOTU was quivering on the floor at his feet.

 

Black is harsh—but he's just. Rereading the speech last night, I was much struck by its air of intellectual exhaustion and sheer unreality. The spectacle of a President of the United States, heir to the mantle of Washington, Lincoln, FDR, Reagan, blathering on about high-speed rail is painful. “We do big things,” Obama declared, speaking of America. That's hardly reassuring, coming as it does from such a small, tiny person.


Posted by tmg110 at 8:24 AM EST
Post Comment | Permalink
Literary Resolution Update
Topic: Must Read

Last night I finished the first volume of Shelby Foote's The Civil War: A Narrative. Two to go!


Posted by tmg110 at 7:49 AM EST
Post Comment | Permalink
DHES Supports the Troops
Topic: Freedom's Guardian

During the Christmas season, the students of Dundee Highlands Elementary School (North Dundee, Illinois), wrote cards and letters to PFC Gregg and all the soldiers of the 511th Military Police Company. This was due to the initiative of one of my coworkers at Tripp Light, Ron Wodka, whose daughter is a student at DHES. On Lexi's behalf, I prepared a brief note of thanks for the students, faculty and staff. Here it is, posted on the door of the school office:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Now that's what I call supporting the troops!


Posted by tmg110 at 7:38 AM EST
Post Comment | Permalink
Wednesday, 26 January 2011
Zzzzzzzzzz. . .
Topic: Liberal Fascism

Oh…sorry…I was just reading President Obama's State of the Union address.

You'll be pleased to learn, I'm sure, that the era of excessive government spending ended last night—our great and glorious leader has taken the courageous step of rebranding it as "investments." That's what Obama thinks of you: that you're too stupid and clueless to notice that "spending" and "investments" amount to the same thing.

No doubt the SOTUA sounded good coming out of  Obama's mouth in that dulcet baritone of his. On the page, however, it falls flat, revealing him as a small man in a job that's way too big for him. It's comical in a way, but disturbing too.


Posted by tmg110 at 7:45 AM EST
Post Comment | Permalink

Newer | Latest | Older