Blog Tools
Edit your Blog
Build a Blog
RSS Feed
View Profile
« March 2011 »
S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31
You are not logged in. Log in
Entries by Topic
All topics  «
Decline of the West
Freedom's Guardian
Liberal Fascism
Military History
Must Read
Politics & Elections
Scratchpad
The Box Office
The Media
Verse
Virtual Reality
My Web Presence
War Flags (Website)
Culture & the Arts
The New Criterion
Twenty-Six Letters
Tuesday, 15 March 2011
Radiation Sickness: The Facts
Topic: Decline of the West

 

In the news report cited in my last post, there is talk of “elevated levels” of radiation being emitted from one of Japan’s damaged nuclear reactors. But just what does “elevated” mean?

 

Here are some hard facts and numbers bearing on the subject of radiation sickness. A radiation dose of 100 rem (roentgen equivalent in man—a standard exposure measurement) over a period of less than a week would cause radiation sickness in half of people exposed. Some 50% of people exposed to 450 rem over a period of a day or two would die within 30 days. A dose of 1,500 rem would kill nearly everybody exposed within 10 days.

 

Radiation sickness damages internal organs, especially the circulatory system. Its symptoms include internal and external hemorrhaging, immune system damage, diarrhea, nausea, vomiting, anorexia, ulcers, hair loss, sterility, miscarriages, thyroid gland damage, fever, and liver damage. Death from radiation sickness is usually caused by damage to blood cells and the circulatory system. Radiation sickness can also cause fatal complications in persons with other injuries, or cause death from minor diseases because of damage to the immune system.

 

See here for more information on radiation effects.

 

Obviously, if there had already been a widespread, catastrophic release of radioactive matter from one of those damaged reactors—sufficient, say to deliver a dose of 300-500 rem over a short period of time—the effects would be showing up now. Hundreds if not thousands of people would be exhibiting the symptoms of radiation sickness. Clearly, this hasn’t happened so far. The situation is serious, no doubt about it. But let’s see what happens before we succumb to a psychological meltdown.


Posted by tmg110 at 8:11 AM EDT
Post Comment | Permalink
If It Glows, It Leads
Topic: The Media

 

It’s interesting to note how quickly the coverage of the Japanese earthquake has come to focus on the damage it caused to a couple of nuclear power plants.

 

The reports I’ve seen so far lead me to suppose that the final body count may exceed 100,000. And out of this dismaying total, how many will have died from radiation poisoning? Probably none—for despite the hysterical squealing of the news media, it appears that no large-scale release of radiation has occurred. I’m not minimizing the seriousness of the situation. Two reactors were badly damaged, and one of them seems to have suffered a partial meltdown. So there’s certainly cause for concern. But the catastrophe so long predicted if a massive earthquake were to strike in the vicinity of a nuclear power plant just didn’t happen.

 

This should be no surprise. Contrary to the fear-mongering propaganda of anti-nuclear environmentalists and other Luddites, nuclear power plants are built to withstand just such extreme events as the Japanese earthquake. And in this case they seem to have done so, albeit with considerable damage and some release of radiation. But in the sad chronicle of this disaster, the part played by reactor damage will constitute but a footnote.

 

During Hurricane Katrina—and more recently during the Gulf oil spill—the news media magnified the horrors of the situation beyond all rational bounds. This makes me very skeptical indeed of their handling of the Japanese earthquake story, and particularly of the way in which they’re presenting the nuclear power segment of the story. Is this the end of the world? I’m not taking the media’s word for it.


Posted by tmg110 at 8:08 AM EDT
Post Comment | Permalink
Monday, 14 March 2011
Back in the USA (2)
Topic: Freedom's Guardian

And here's a photo of Lexi with her other biggest fan (her sister Kelly):


Posted by tmg110 at 9:01 AM EDT
Post Comment | Permalink
Back in the USA (1)
Topic: Freedom's Guardian

Here's a photo of PFC Gregg with two of her biggest fans (Mom & Dad), shortly after her arrival at South Bend last Wednesday:


Posted by tmg110 at 8:58 AM EDT
Post Comment | Permalink
Friday, 11 March 2011
Welcome Home, PFC!
Topic: Freedom's Guardian

I'm pleased to report that Lexi finally made it home to Mishawaka on Wednesday. She's feeling good and looking forward to her leave. More (including pics) later.


Posted by tmg110 at 9:03 AM EST
Post Comment | Permalink
Wednesday, 9 March 2011
Obama the Magical Manager? Not So Much!
Topic: Decline of the West

 

This is actually kind of funny. Among the duties being loaded on the shoulders of Bill Daley, the new White House chief of staff, is the tricky job of repairing relations between The Great One…excuse me, President Obama…and his own cabinet!

 

All right, sure, to be fair, bad blood between the White House staff and the cabinet secretaries is nothing new. When he was Nixon’s national security adviser, Henry Kissinger played bureaucratic hardball with the State Department—cutting the Secretary of State, Bill Rodgers, right out of the decision-making loop. And really, it’s no surprise to learn that many of Obama’s cabinet secretaries are frustrated. Look who they’ve had to deal with: the foul-mouthed Rahm Emmanuel, the insufferable twerp Robert Gibbs, a posse of executive branch “czars” with indeterminate portfolios, etc. But I thought that among all his other shining attributes of virtue, Barack Obama was a brilliant hands-on manager of the bureaucracy. Guess not.


Posted by tmg110 at 8:11 AM EST
Post Comment | Permalink
The Gray Lady's Gitmo Lament
Topic: Decline of the West

You have to love the New York Times’ take on The Divine One’s…excuse me, President Obama’s…decision to keep Gitmo open after all:

 

The prison at Guantánamo Bay, Cuba, has long been the embodiment of Bush-era arrogance and lawlessness, and Barack Obama raised the hopes of millions around the world in 2008 when he campaigned on the promise of closing it. On Monday, that promise crumbled, the victim of Congressional spinelessness and President Obama’s inability to create political support for a way out of the moral quagmire created by his predecessor.

 

Excuse me for a moment while I wipe the tears from my eyes…there. That’s better.

 

Now, I actually don’t dispute the thought that lies behind the Times’ use of the term “moral quagmire.” The landscape of war is characterized by that terrain feature. In a perfect world, presidents and members of Congress would be equipped with neat little maps (perhaps printed on the Times’ very own presses), showing them the way through. But in reality, war quite often presents them with a menu of more or less unappetizing options—and demands a decision. Obama’s original promise to close Gitmo, which was based on a lack of information and a smarmy pretense of moral superiority, was no such tough decision. It was based on nothing more than the egomaniacal belief that, being Obama, he could twist reality into some new shape of his own choosing. Eventually he found out that he couldn’t, with the result that has the Times in a tizzy.

 

Obama’s “inability to create political support” for the closure of Gitmo is not surprising, since when the time came to present his alternative policy it turned out that he didn’t have one. The editorial page staff of the New York Times has the luxury of living in liberal la-la land, where all decisions are easy and obvious. President Obama has discovered that he’s in a different place. I’m sure the realization makes him grind his teeth. But in the end, he sketched a bow to reality.


Posted by tmg110 at 7:37 AM EST
Updated: Wednesday, 16 March 2011 9:25 AM EDT
Post Comment | Permalink
She's Baaaaaack. . .
Topic: Freedom's Guardian

Well, not quite, but she soon will be. PFC Gregg is due to arrive in South Bend, Indiana, at 1700 hours (5pm to you civilians) on 9 March 2011. That would be today. Lexi, welcome home!


Posted by tmg110 at 7:24 AM EST
Post Comment | Permalink
Tuesday, 8 March 2011
The Messiah Does a Backflip
Topic: Decline of the West

 

His Imperial Magnificence…excuse me, President Obama…has done it again. After gassing and bloviating in tones of great indignation over the evils of Gitmo, our dear leader has decided to—keep the place open! What’s more, he has decided to resume trying terrorists before those questionable, not to say quasi-fascist military tribunals

 

How could this be?

 

Perhaps the Great O was vouchsafed a divine revelation—a voice issuing from a burning bush or something like that. It is not for mere mortals such as myself to questions the twists and turns of our beloved savior’s thinking. But somewhere far back in the shadowy depths of my subconscious mind a voice whispers that maybe, just maybe, Obama had no idea what he was talking about when he promised to close Gitmo and try terrorists in front of "The People’s Court."

 


Posted by tmg110 at 8:33 AM EST
Updated: Tuesday, 8 March 2011 8:38 AM EST
Post Comment | Permalink
Sorry, No Head Start
Topic: Liberal Fascism

 

The federal government is spending roughly $10 billion per year on a program called Head Start. It is a program with laudable aims. Launched in 1965 during the heyday of Lyndon Johnson’s Great Society, Head Start aims to close the education gap between children from poor families and those more fortunately situated. It purports to do this by providing daycare, nutrition assistance and educational skills to preschoolers from poor families, thus giving them a head start as they enter grade school.

 

I say “purports” because all the evidence indicated that Head Start just doesn’t work. As Mona Charen notes in this column, “A 1969 study found that any gains participants displayed faded away in the early grades. By third grade, Head Start graduates were indistinguishable from their non-participating classmates.” Though Head Start does accomplish some good things—it provides immunizations, for example—experts have concluded that these things could be provided more cheaply and efficiently through other existing programs like Medicaid. In short, Head Start is a waste of money, and the $1.1 billion cut in the program that has been proposed by the GOP House is completely justified. Logic, indeed, suggests that Head Start should simply be abolished.

 

But as Charen notes, progressives are simply impervious to the ironclad evidence of Head Start’s failure. These characters never met a failed social program that they didn’t like, and Head Start is no exception. The proposed cut has them frothing at the mouth with outraged indignation. It’s outrageous! It’s a war on children! Blah, blah, blah. With such adolescent theatrics as these does the self-described reality-based community suppress the inconvenient truth.


Posted by tmg110 at 8:08 AM EST
Post Comment | Permalink

Newer | Latest | Older