Blog Tools
Edit your Blog
Build a Blog
RSS Feed
View Profile
« June 2011 »
S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30
You are not logged in. Log in
Entries by Topic
All topics  «
Decline of the West
Freedom's Guardian
Liberal Fascism
Military History
Must Read
Politics & Elections
Scratchpad
The Box Office
The Media
Verse
Virtual Reality
My Web Presence
War Flags (Website)
Culture & the Arts
The New Criterion
Twenty-Six Letters
Tuesday, 7 June 2011
He's No Clinton
Topic: Decline of the West

 

Two facts seem pretty clear at this point in the overture to the 2012 election season: (1) the economy is not in good shape, and (2) the Obama Administration has no idea what to do about it.

 

Back in April, there were many predictions that the President would don his green eyeshade, sharpen his pencil and join the GOP in an orgy of budget cutting. It was time, the pundits said, for Obama to perform a hard pivot from left to center in the style of Bill Clinton. Thus would he woo anew the independents whose votes swept him to victory in 2008. Bill did it and got himself reelected; Barry could do it too.

 

This prediction took account of everything, except the facts.

 

What I’ve come to think of as the Obama Illusion—that since he’s is a smart guy he must be a pragmatist—dates from the early days of his presidency and has proved stubbornly resistant to multiple reality checks. Actually, there’s no particular reason to believe that superior intelligence guarantees good judgment. Smart people do stupid things every day. So while it’s obvious that pragmatism is in Obama’s best interests just now, his supporters shouldn’t get their hopes up.

 

As students of history well know, good judgment is a rare commodity. Certainly it’s much less common that mere intelligence. The reason, I think, is that a high IQ is just one component of good judgment—and not the most important one, either. Good judgment is an amalgam of three elements: intelligence, experience and character. A person of average intelligence who has profited by experience and possesses a sound character is far more likely to make good decisions that an extremely intelligent person who lacks experience and possesses a weak character. Does the latter person sound like anyone we know?

 

Barack Obama is very smart—no doubt about it. But he lacks executive experience, which is a handicap for a president, though not necessarily a fatal one. His most crippling deficiency lies in the area of character. Thin-skinned, cold-blooded, disdainful of his opponents, careless with facts and, above all, mightily impressed with his own wonderfulness, our president’s character is just plain un-presidential. It makes him impervious to reality—a serious deficiency indeed. Barry the Pragmatist? He’s a fantasy figure. What we see in the Oval Office is what we get.


Posted by tmg110 at 8:23 AM EDT
Post Comment | Permalink
Another Racist Leftie
Topic: Liberal Fascism

 

You may think that requiring voters to properly identify themselves before casting their ballots is a reasonable precaution against vote fraud. But according to Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz, Democrat of Florida and chairperson of the Democratic National Committee, if you do think that you’re a Jim Crow racist—literally! Here's what she said—literally:

 

[N]ow you have the Republicans, who want to literally drag us all the way back to Jim Crow laws and literally—and very transparently—block access to the polls to voters who are more likely to vote Democratic candidates than Republican candidates. And it's nothing short of that blatant.

 

Obviously, this malignant harpy doesn’t know or care what the adverb “literally” means. She just tossed it in there for emphasis. I also like “very transparently.” What’s up with that? Is she saying that the GOP has openly proclaimed its allegiance to Jim Crow? If so, I must somehow have missed the biggest news story since the Emancipation Proclamation.

 

Okay, sure, Debbie’s a box of rocks. Anyone who’s ever seen her on TV knows that much and perhaps it’s ungentlemanly of me to point it out. Besides, there’s no shortage of stupid progressives. But her racist world-view ought not to be overlooked. Wasserman Schultz appears to believe that “minorities”—primarily black in this case—are pitiful, indigent wretches who possess no means of identifying themselves and would cringe with terror if asked to produce ID at the polls. That’s what Debbie’s saying—if you think about it. These days, Jim Crow reads the Nation.


Posted by tmg110 at 7:33 AM EDT
Post Comment | Permalink
Monday, 6 June 2011
Decision in Normandy
Topic: Freedom's Guardian

 

Today is the 67th anniversary of D-Day—the Allied invasion of Normandy that opened the decisive campaign of World War II in the West. Less than a year after the first US, British and Canadian troops stormed ashore Hitler was dead, the Nazi regime was abolished and after six horrific years the great death machine of world war had finally shuddered to a stop. It was a triumphant moment—but the price was high. As we honor those who serve today, let us remember those who were there on June 6, 1944.


Posted by tmg110 at 8:12 AM EDT
Post Comment | Permalink
Name Recognition
Topic: Decline of the West

 

Regarding the travails of Rep. Anthony Weiner, Democrat of New York, I can only observe that I shall never again hear, speak, read or write the title “Member of Congress” without thinking of him—and smirking.


Posted by tmg110 at 7:58 AM EDT
Post Comment | Permalink
Afghanistan Update
Topic: Freedom's Guardian

We spoke to PFC Gregg yesterday and were glad to learn that she and her fellow soldiers of the 511th MP Company are all doing fine. Lexi says that things remain quiet in the 511th's area of operations. The Renegades (that's the company's new nickname) are now three-quarters of the way through their deployment and everyone's looking forward to the day when they can bid the Sandbox a true soldier's farewell.


Posted by tmg110 at 7:49 AM EDT
Post Comment | Permalink
The Party's Over
Topic: Scratchpad

 

It was a great and memorable cruise—thank you, Royal Caribbean International! But all good things must come to an end and here I am again, casting a disapproving eye over the news of the day, revving up for a long, hot summer of scorching punditry. Brace yourself, Barry…


Posted by tmg110 at 7:41 AM EDT
Post Comment | Permalink
Wednesday, 25 May 2011
Away We Go
Topic: Scratchpad

 

I wish I had time for one more snarky comment on Our Beloved Guide and Teacher…excuse me, President Obama…but the Bermuda Triangle is calling. For the next week and a half my wife and I will be cruising. (You won't be, but those are the breaks.) I may find the time for an occasional post; then again I might not. And you know, a good long break from the news sounds quite wonderful…


Posted by tmg110 at 5:27 PM EDT
Post Comment | Permalink
Sandbox Weather
Topic: Freedom's Guardian

PFC Gregg says that the weather is lovely this time of year in Afghanistan. Sometimes it's really, really hot and sometimes its really, really hot and windy. When the wind blows over the Sandbox, you get a sandstorm. Here's what an Afghan sandstorm looks like, viewed over the sights of an M2 .50-caliber machine gun:


Posted by tmg110 at 5:24 PM EDT
Post Comment | Permalink
Strike Three
Topic: Decline of the West

 

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu capped his rout of Barack Obama yesterday with a masterful, rapturously received speech before the US Congress. Anyone who still doubted that Barry fumbled the ball with his tilt toward the Palestinian position had his illusions rudely trampled. (See here for Jonathan Tobin’s analysis of Netanyahu’s win.)

 

What I find remarkable about all this is that President Obama seems unteachable. This latest fiasco marks the third time that he and his administration have sought to bully, intimidate and/or humiliate Israel and its leader, only to come off second best. One such unforced error—all right. Two such errors—well, some people are resistant to reality checks. But three nearly identical goofs? How is that possible? Isn’t Barack Obama the greatest genius ever to occupy the Oval Office? Just ask him!

 

Now of course Obama knows that American public opinion strongly favors Israel, seeing that nation (rightly, in my opinion) as a beacon of freedom and a reliable American ally in a dark corner of the world. But once again, his overweening hubris prevents him from making what would be, for any other politician, the inevitable bow to reality. (Bows before Saudi Arabian princes are another matter!) Israel is one of those issues on which it’s impossible for a president to govern against public opinion. But our glorious leader seems to believe that because he’s Barack Obama, the rules don’t apply to him. As a result, he (and the country he represents) must endure repeated humiliations of the kind just inflicted on us by the Israeli prime minister.

 

I don’t blame Netanyahu. He’s entitled to look after the interests of his own country. In this instance he did so ably. I blame Obama for another obtuse, stupid, unforced error that helped nobody—especially not the Palestinians who are supposedly the object of his tender solicitude.


Posted by tmg110 at 8:06 AM EDT
Post Comment | Permalink
Tuesday, 24 May 2011
We're Not Amused Either
Topic: Decline of the West

 

Here’s a fairly scathing analysis of President Obama’s latest foray into the fever swamp of the Mideast “peace process,” from the (UK) Telegraph’s Tony Harnden. I was particularly struck by this observation:

 

In the Oval Office on Friday, Mr Obama did little to disguise his irritation with Benjamin Netanyahu, the Israeli premier, for turning to him to deliver an impassioned tutorial on Israel's history in the full glare of the cameras.

 

"It's the ancient nation of Israel," the Likud leader told Mr Obama. "We've been around for almost 4,000 years. We have experienced struggle and suffering like no other people. We've gone through expulsions and pogroms and massacres and the murder of millions."

It was an unprecedented rebuke of an American president by an Israeli premier. Menachem Begin is said to have delivered similar monologues to President Jimmy Carter, but never in public.

 

Even 48 hours later, it was clear at the Aipac conference that Mr Obama, who is remarkably thin-skinned for a top-flight American politician and has never been lacking in self-regard, was still smarting.

 

When loud applause greeted Mr Obama's mention of Mr Netanyahu's name, the president's eyes narrowed and he chewed his lip. He was distinctly unamused.

 

“Aipac” is the American Israel Public Affairs Committee; here in America it’s all capped as AIPAC—which, if Mr. Harnden’s account is to be credited, received the President with something less than warm regard.

 

What interested me was Harnden’s observation that the President seems “remarkably thin-skinned.” This is indeed a consideral handicap for anyone in such a high position. After the furor caused by his comments about the 1967 borders of Israel as the starting point of peace negotiations, Obama had a golden opprtunity to smooth things over in his speech to AIPAC. Instead, he chose to deliver a finger-wagging lecture.

 

 

It appears to me that Benjamin Netanyahu has taken Barack Obama’s measure. His Oval Office lecture on the history of the Jewish people was, I believe, a calculated move designed to corner the President. And it succeeded. Had Obama backtracked, that would have been widely viewed as a victory for Israel. But instead he doubled down, which only deepens the Israeli public’s suspicions of Obama’s motives, thereby bolstering Netanyahu’s domestic political position. It was a bravura performance on the part of the Israeli prime minister—and another embarrassing fumble by the hapless American president.


Posted by tmg110 at 8:26 AM EDT
Updated: Wednesday, 25 May 2011 7:34 AM EDT
Post Comment | Permalink

Newer | Latest | Older