Blog Tools
Edit your Blog
Build a Blog
RSS Feed
View Profile
« December 2011 »
S M T W T F S
1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30 31
You are not logged in. Log in
Entries by Topic
All topics  «
Decline of the West
Freedom's Guardian
Liberal Fascism
Military History
Must Read
Politics & Elections
Scratchpad
The Box Office
The Media
Verse
Virtual Reality
My Web Presence
War Flags (Website)
Culture & the Arts
The New Criterion
Twenty-Six Letters
Wednesday, 14 December 2011
Tell Us What You Really Think
Topic: Decline of the West

 

The Chevy Volt? It’s “a car for idiots” in the view of Audi of America’s Johan de Nysschen. “No one is going to pay a $15,000 premium for a car that competes with a Corolla,” he said in a post on his company’s Facebook page. “So there are not enough idiots who will buy it.”

 

Here’s what de Nysschen meant. The Volt lists for about $40,000, compared with its competition, compact models ranging in price from $20,000 to $25,000. Fuel savings over the life of the Volt aren’t anywhere near enough to bridge that huge price gap. Even with a hefty government tax subsidy thrown in, the Volt makes no sense from the point of view of the new car buyer. What's more, there are now serious and growing about battery safety. And you wonder why sales of this electro-turkey have been less than brisk?

 

It’s true that Mr. de Nysschen is an interested party: After all, Audi competes with Chevrolet in the US auto market. And it’s also true that he later walked back his remark, perhaps realizing that one should never refer to potential customers as idiots. But still, it’s hard to dispute the truth of his observation that the Chevy Volt appeals primarily to upscale progressives who seek an enviro-politically correct status symbol on wheels.


Posted by tmg110 at 12:58 PM EST
Post Comment | Permalink
Badness is Heavy-Handed (Part One)
Topic: The Box Office

 

Here’s another well-qualified candidate for the Worst Movies Ever list: Starship Troopers (1997), director Paul Verhoeven’s desecration of Robert Heinlein’s classic and controversial science fiction novel.

 

First, some background: The novel, Starship Troopers, was published in 1959, attracting both praise for its portrayal of future war and condemnation for its supposedly fascist sympathies. The thing that drove Heinlein’s leftie critics up the wall was the novel’s socio-political background: In his imaginary future polity—the Terran Federation—the right to vote, hold political office and qualify for certain jobs, e.g. as a police officer, was restricted to veterans of "Federal Service." Heinlein and Starship Troopers were excoriated for the suggestion that only military veterans should enjoy the privileges of full citizenship. This detail was roundly condemned at the time as “fascism,” a charge that has resounded down the years.

 

If you actually read the novel, however, you’ll find that Federal Service is not restricted to the armed forces. Everyone has the right to qualify for citizenship by performing government service of some kind. Though the novel focuses on the various military branches, Heinlein does make a point of noting that anyone, even a person with severe disabilities—blindness, missing limbs—is entitled to serve and become a citizen. Furthermore, all citizens and legal residents of the Terran Federation enjoy full civil liberties: freedom of speech, press, assembly, religion, etc. Whether such a political arrangement would work in practice is a debatable point, but fascism it’s not.

 

In the novel, the Terran Federation is at war with an alien race called the Arachnids: a hive society with a collective consciousness. Though Heinlein emphasizes their alienness, he also notes that the Arachnids are an advanced race. They’ve developed interstellar spaceflight and technologically they’re roughly on the Terran level. Rather disturbingly in the eyes of a contemporary, politically correct progressive, Heinlein notes that the war is a literal struggle for survival: either humanity or the Bugs, as they’re nicknamed, will inevitably be wiped out. Heinlein’s Darwinian attitude has given rise to charges of racism—this despite the fact that his Terran Federation is multi-ethnic, with no domination by one race or ethnic group over the rest. Indeed, the novel’s protagonist, Juan "Johnnie" Rico, is a Filipino.

 

(See here for one particularly egregious misrepresentation of Starship Troopers that typlifies the criticism it continues to attract.)

 

Heinlein’s description of the weapons and tactics used by his future soldiers—the Mobile Infantry or M.I.—represents SF at its best: a thoughtful speculation about the future of military art and science. The M.I. is an elite organization with some resemblance to the US Marine Corps and some to the US Army Rangers. Only about 10% of recruits make it through the long and arduous training program. In combat, M.I. troopers wear powered armor exoskeletons that enable them to carry more and heavier weapons, move faster and even leap over tall building and obstacles. The Navy of the Terran Federation transports M.I. units and drops them onto the surface of target planets. Heinlein devotes a good deal of attention to the training, equipment and tactical employment of the Mobile Infantry, creating a realistic background for his story. This, probably, is why the novel remains in print and continues to be read.

 

And the movie? Cinematic special effects have developed to a point where Starship Troopers could have been made into a kickass action flick. But postmodern Hollywood can never resist desecrating a classic. In my next post, I’ll discuss—or rather excoriate—the mess that Hollywood made of Heinlein's novel.


Posted by tmg110 at 10:15 AM EST
Updated: Wednesday, 14 December 2011 10:32 AM EST
Post Comment | Permalink
Tuesday, 13 December 2011
Glenn the Goofball
Topic: Decline of the West

 

This morning on his radio show, Glenn Beck remarked that if Newt Gingrich becomes the Republican Party’s presidential nominee and Ron Paul undertakes a third-party candidacy, he’d consider voting for Paul.

 

WTF?! Doesn’t Beck realize that a third-party bid by a libertarian or conservative would most likely hand the election to Barack Obama? Or does he indeed know this and simply not care? I’ve never liked this guy, not since the first time I caught him bloviating on Fox. Beck likes to play the historical scholar—but his grasp of history is superficial, e.g. his lame attempt to draw a comparison between Weimar Germany and present-day America. He likes to play the sober, responsible citizen commentator—but then he gives a nod of approval to Ron Paul, a wingnut of the purest ray serene.

 

Glenn, I don’t know how to put this any other way but impolitely: You’re a jerk.


Posted by tmg110 at 10:49 AM EST
Post Comment | Permalink
You Always Hurt the One You Love
Topic: Liberal Fascism

 

As if to demonstrate just how out of touch it really is, the Occupy Wall Street movement has embarked upon a campaign of economic disruption. On the West Coast, OWS has forced the closure of a number of ports, supposedly to prevent those wicked One Percenters from reaping their illicit profits.

 

In reality, of course, the people who are really being hurt by our American Communards are ordinary working stiffs: truck drivers, dock workers, small business owners, i.e. the Ninety-Nine Percenters. And some of those folks were far from happy about the situation:

 

[T]ruck drivers who had to wait in long lines as protesters blocked gates, were angry, saying the demonstrators were harming the very people they were trying to help.

 

“This is joke. What are they protesting?” said Christian Vega, who sat in his truck carrying a load of recycled paper. He said the delay was costing him $600. “It only hurts me and the other drivers.

 

“We have jobs and families to support and feed,” he said. “Most of them don’t.”

 

Watching silly people play at revolution can be an amusing pastime, but let us not forget that these idiots are capable of doing real harm to real people.


Posted by tmg110 at 10:30 AM EST
Updated: Tuesday, 13 December 2011 10:35 AM EST
Post Comment | Permalink
Saturday, 10 December 2011
Barry's Whine List
Topic: Decline of the West

 

This just in: Barack Obama does not control the weather!

 

The President made this startling admission in an interview with CBS News reporter Steve Croft:

 

Sometimes when I'm talking to my team, I describe us…as…I'm the captain and they're the crew on a ship, going through really bad storms. And no matter how well we're steering the ship, if the boat's rocking back and forth and people are getting sick and…they're being buffeted by the winds and the rain and…at a certain point—if you're asking, "Are you enjoying the ride right now?" Folks are going to say, "No." And are they going to say, "Do you think the captain's good—doing a good job?" People are going say, "You know what? A good captain would have had us in some smooth waters and sunny skies, at this point." And I don't control the weather. What I can control are the policies we're putting in place to make a difference in people's lives.

 

Captain Abab, maybe—or perhaps the captain of the Titanic. Anyhow, no can deny that Obama has made a difference in people’s lives—just ask the long-term unemployed.

 

The President also protested that he hadn’t “overpromised” during the 2008 campaign. Now he tell us that he “always knew” that fixing the economy would take a long time—maybe even eight years or more! Wouldn’t it have been nice if he shared that insight with his adoring fans prior to Election Day? But don’t worry! Barry’s confident that the unemployment rate will be down to 8% by November 2012.

 

As America contemplates the mess that the Obama Administration has made of just about everything it meddled in, from Solyndra to Libya, the President’s whining and excuse-making grows ever more pathetic. “It wasn’t my fault!” he blubbers. "I’m doing my best!”

 

Over to you, Mr. Churchill: “It is no use saying, ‘We are doing our best.’ You have got to succeed in doing what is necessary.” How do you think that the great man would evaluate Barack Obama’s best effort?


Posted by tmg110 at 10:17 AM EST
Updated: Saturday, 10 December 2011 10:43 AM EST
Post Comment | Permalink
Thursday, 8 December 2011
Dumb and Institutionally Dumber
Topic: Decline of the West

 

Barack Obama is not a stupid man, but his administration is surely one of the dumbest in the history of the American presidency. Here’s a minor but telling example:

 

Sen. Susan Collins on Wednesday blasted the Defense Department for classifying the Fort Hood massacre as workplace violence and suggested political correctness is being placed above the security of the nation's Armed Forces at home.

 

During a joint session of the Senate and House Homeland Security Committee on Wednesday, the Maine Republican referenced a letter from the Defense Department depicting the Fort Hood shootings as workplace violence. She criticized the Obama administration for failing to identify the threat as radical Islam.

 

I imagine some DoD bureaucrat sitting at his desk, straining mightily to come up with a way of describing the Fort Hood massacre without offending “moderate Muslims.” A long silence—then a sudden snap of the fingers! “Hey, let’s call it ‘workplace violence!’” And the chump who came up with this bright idea probably has a master’s degree in international relations from Harvard or Columbia.

 

Of course all government is bureaucratic, hence prone to stupidity. But add a big pinch of political correctness and you get such tasty tidbits as “man-caused disaster” and “workplace violence” in place of the less sensitive but far more accurate term “Islamofascist terrorism.”


Posted by tmg110 at 9:53 AM EST
Post Comment | View Comments (4) | Permalink
It's News to Them
Topic: Liberal Fascism

 

Stop the presses! This just in:

 

[N]early all job growth in the United States comes from entrepreneurial startups, which by their nature are products of Main Street. It is equally significant that more than 90 percent of the entrepreneurs responsible for job growth come from middle-class or the top end of lower-class backgrounds. Less than 1 percent of America’s job-creating entrepreneurs come from extremely rich or extremely poor backgrounds.

 

If you think I lifted this from a GOP press release, you’re wrong. In fact it comes from an article by David Korten and John Cavanaugh in Nation of Change, a progressive on-line screamer. NoC has been loud, not to say hysterical, in its support of the Occupy Wall Street movement, so why this wet kiss for the bourgeois bloodsuckers, er, entrepreneurs of America? Why, because they’re not “U.S. transnational corporations.” Main Street, not Wall Street—get it?

 

So far, so good. I’m all in favor of policies that support entrepreneurs and small business generally. But hold on! It turns out that Korten and Cavanaugh are merely attempting to enlist Main Street into the Vanguard of the Proletariat. Here’s their seven-point program to foster entrepreneurship in America:

 

  1. Redefine our economic priorities by replacing financial indicators with real-wealth indicators as the basis for evaluating economic performance.
  2. Restructure the money system to root the power to create and allocate money in Main Street financial institutions that support Main Street job creation.
  3. Restore the middle class by restoring progressive tax and employment policies and a strong and secure social safety net.
  4. Create a framework of economic incentives that favor human-scale enterprises that are locally owned by people who have a natural interest in the health and well-being of their community and its natural environment.
  5. Protect markets and democracy from corruption by concentrations of unaccountable corporate power.
  6. Organize the global economy into substantially self-reliant regional economies that align and partner with the structure and dynamics of Earth’s biosphere.
  7. Put in place global rules and institutions that secure the universal rights of people and support democratic self-governance and economic self-reliance at all system levels.

 

Even when they start with a valid premise, progressives can’t help drifting off—no doubt on a cloud of marijuana smoke—into leftie la-la land. How to support small business? By redefining our economic priorities! By organizing the global economy! By securing the universal rights of people! In short, by enormously expanding the power of government! Why, an ambitious entrepreneur with a good idea should welcome the help of the Department of Human-Scale Enterprises!

 

What a bunch of dorm room bull session baloney. If this is the best that the Revolution can do, Wall Street has little to worry about.


Posted by tmg110 at 8:51 AM EST
Updated: Thursday, 8 December 2011 9:01 AM EST
Post Comment | Permalink
Wednesday, 7 December 2011
Day of Infamy, 1941-2011
Topic: Freedom's Guardian

The USS Arizona (BB-39) as she appeared at the time of the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor, Hawaii. A battleship of the Pennsylvania class, she was constructed at the Brooklyn Navy Yard and commissioned in 1916. Between 1929 and 1931 she was thoroughly modernized, emergining in the configuration depicted in this photo. (Note the tripod masts topped with gunnery control positions and the aircraft catapults on the after turret and fantail.) The Arizona is shown here at sea in Hawaiian waters on a gunnery training exercise.

On December 7, 1941, the Arizona was lying at anchor in Pearl Harbor. After several bomb hits and near misses that caused minor damage, she was struck by a bomb that penetrated the deck armor and detonated the ship's forward ammunition magazine. The Arizona blew up and sank, taking 1,117 of her crew with her. Her wreck still lies on the bottom at at Pearl Harbor, marked by a memorial to the crewmen who remain entombed within her hull. December 7, 1941-December 7, 2011. Lest we forget.


Posted by tmg110 at 9:13 AM EST
Post Comment | Permalink
Monday, 5 December 2011
There's Stacey, Then There's Tracy
Topic: Liberal Fascism

 

Though I believe it’s true that kooks like Stacey Hessler typify the Occupy Wall Street movement, It’s nice to learn that there are exceptions. One of them is Tracy Postert, an OWS protester who parlayed her activism into a Wall Street job:

 

[Postert], who has a Ph.D. in biomedical science specializing in pharmacology, was unemployed and had all but given up on finding work in her preferred field of academia when she joined the movement in October.

 

She held signs that read, “Reagan sucks,” and, “I’ll vote after the revolution.”

But she said she still needed to get a real job. So she made a new sign.

 

On the front, she wrote, “Ph.D. Biomedical Scientist seeking full time employment,” and on the back, “Ask me for my resume.”

 

It caught the eye of Wayne Kaufman, chief market analyst for John Thomas Financial Brokerage. The exec wasn’t looking to hire, but he took Postert’s résumé anyway.

 

That was Oct. 22, Postert’s Day 10 as an Occupier.

 

The next day, Kaufman, impressed by her CV, sent her an e-mail asking if she’d like to come for an interview.

 

>snip<

 

 “I had been unemployed for so long, I thought why not?” said Postert, adding that she is in her 30s and has no background in finance or business.

 

>snip<

 

Kaufman offered her a job as a junior analyst evaluating medical companies as potential investments.

 

Postert said the decision to accept was painful.

 

But practicality won out.

 

So goes the story in today's New York Post. She’s been on the job for three weeks now. Great story, eh? Just goes to show that for those who take the initiative, America is still the land of opportunity. Welcome to the Dark Side, Tracy!


Posted by tmg110 at 2:31 PM EST
Updated: Monday, 5 December 2011 2:38 PM EST
Post Comment | View Comments (1) | Permalink
Howard Claims Immunity
Topic: Decline of the West

 

So Ambassador Howard Gutman, the US diplomat who stepped all over it by blaming anti-Semitism on Jews, is defending himself by noting that he himself is Jewish and what’s more, he’s the son of a Holocaust survivor. Therefore, presumably, he can say whatever he likes about Jews and Israel, however false and offensive. “I strongly condemn antisemitism in all its forms. I deeply regret if my comments were taken the wrong way,” he piously declared. “My own personal history and that of my family is testimony to the salience of this issue and my continued commitment to combating antisemitism.”

 

Gutman's apologia wouldn’t have impressed Plutarch, who wrote: “It is a fine thing to be well descended, but the glory belongs to our ancestors.”


Posted by tmg110 at 1:59 PM EST
Post Comment | Permalink

Newer | Latest | Older