Blog Tools
Edit your Blog
Build a Blog
RSS Feed
View Profile
« April 2012 »
S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30
You are not logged in. Log in
Entries by Topic
All topics  «
Decline of the West
Freedom's Guardian
Liberal Fascism
Military History
Must Read
Politics & Elections
Scratchpad
The Box Office
The Media
Verse
Virtual Reality
My Web Presence
War Flags (Website)
Culture & the Arts
The New Criterion
Twenty-Six Letters
Friday, 13 April 2012
Playing Politics with the Law?
Topic: Decline of the West

 

A great sigh of relief went up when the special prosecutor in the Treyvon Martin case charged George Zimmerman with second-degree murder. But maybe people should have held their breath. For as Alan Dershowitz has pointed out, the charging instrument submitted by prosecutor Angela Corey in no way establishes probable cause for a charge of murder two.

 

Florida law defines second-degree murder in these words: “The unlawful killing of a human being, when perpetrated by any act imminently dangerous to another and evincing a depraved mind regardless of human life, although without any premeditated design to effect the death of any particular individual.” Dershowitz notes, however, that the prosecution’s charging instrument does not suggest probable cause to believe Zimmerman had a “depraved mind regardless of human life” when he shot Martin. On the contrary, the facts provided are entirely consistent with Zimmerman’s self-defense claim. Dershowitz suspects that the second-degree murder charge was a political move by Corey, an elected public official.

 

To call his suspicion is plausible would be a considerable understatement. I’m no lawyer, but I was quite startled when Cory came out with a second-degree murder charge. Her dramatic announcement of the charge led me to believe that the prosecution must have developed some pretty damning evidence against Zimmerman. But as Dershowitz points out, the charging instrument doesn’t even establish probable cause.

 

Treyvon Martin and his family deserve justice. So does George Zimmerman. But in a case like this, justice is probably too much to hope for.


Posted by tmg110 at 1:45 PM EDT
Post Comment | Permalink
Save Your Receipt
Topic: Decline of the West

Not the least amusing aspect of the Hilary Rosen/Ann Romney flap is that Rosen is a highly compensated expert on public relations and communications strategies—in fact, she's a partner in the political communications firm SKDKnickerbocker. (Incidentally, SKDK just happens to represent contraception crusader Sandra Fluke. Go figure.)

Think about that: Hilary Rosen, foot lodged firmly in mouth, crafting communications strategies for high-profile Democrats. DNC chair Debbie Wasserman Schultz for one should definitely demand a refund…


Posted by tmg110 at 11:24 AM EDT
Post Comment | Permalink
South Jersey or North Korea?
Topic: Decline of the West

 

Sign of the times: “A South Jersey man has come up with what he hopes is a solution to a controversy over the American flag that he flew in his yard—a flag bearing the image of President Barack Obama in place of the field of stars.”

 

Wes Kennedy’s neighbors in Lumberton, New Jersey’s Arcadia housing development apparently found the Barry and Stripes flag objectionable. “In Acacia, there are some angry, maybe even evil-minded people about Obama,” he told a reporter. He has since replaced it with two flags: the Stars and Stripes and a flag bearing Obama’s angelic visage. (Hat tip: CBS News.)

 

Two points:

 

(1) If it were up to me, Kennedy’s Barry and Stripes flag would still be flying. We do have the right to freedom of expression in this country, however unpopular a concept this may be in certain circles on both the left and the right. I'd remind my fellow conservatives how indignant we all become over stories of neighborhood associations that demand removal of the Stars and Stripes from someone’s property.

 

(2) The Cult of Barry is très creepy. Exactly what is going through the minds of people who display objets d’art like this?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

     I think they’re saying: “I’d rather be in North Korea.”


Posted by tmg110 at 9:25 AM EDT
Updated: Friday, 13 April 2012 9:46 AM EDT
Post Comment | Permalink
Thursday, 12 April 2012
Hilary Rosen, Tribune of the Sisterhood
Topic: Liberal Fascism

 

I had to laugh this morning as I perused the news about Democratic Party operative Hilary Rosen’s maladroit attack on Mitt Romney’s wife, Ann. Responding to the candidate’s comment that when he wants to know what’s on women’s minds, he asks his wife, Rosen sneered that the mother of five “had never worked a day in her life” and therefore cannot possibly have the first idea what’s going on with the average American woman.

 

Instant brouhaha!

 

Democrats scrambled to distance themselves from Rosen’s comments, as well they might given their recent claims that Republicans are waging a “war on women.” Now that one of their own appears to be waging a civil war on women who don’t fit the progressive feminist template, Democrats are shuffling their feet and clearing their throats.

 

In true leftie fashion, Rosen first refused to back off from her comments about Ann Romney and then, no doubt under pressure from a nervous Obama campaign, issued the standard non-apology. Her words were “poorly chosen,” you see. And just to underline the extent of her clueless idiocy, Rosen insisted on CNN that hey, Democrats had never, ever used the term “war on women”! Um, except for Nancy Pelosi, James Carville, Donna Brazille…

 

So clearly this woman, Hilary Rosen, is a dolt. What she said was not only offensive, it was stupid. But that wasn’t really the best part of the story. No, what really had me on the floor laughing was Rosen’s underlying implication: Ann Romney doesn’t know what American women are thinking, but I do.

 

Okay, let’s see about that. Here’s Rosen’s background (with a tip of the hat to Wikipedia):

 

Born and raised in West Orange, NJ

 

BBA degree, George Washington University.

 

1987 to 2003: Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA); served as president, then chairman and chief executive, officer, 1994-2003.

 

Took time off in 2003-04 to spend time with her partner, Elizabeth Birch, and their children.

 

2004-06: Interim director for the Human Rights Campaign, a GLBT lobbyist organization

 

2006: Founded a consulting firm, Berman Rosen Global Strategies, specializing in digital media and the entertainment industry with Jason Berman, former Chairman of the International Recording Industry Association (IFPI)

 

2007: Launched OurChart.com with business partner Ilene Chaiken, creator of the L Word. OurChart.com was a social networking and entertainment site targeted to lesbians and their friends based on the Showtime series, The L Word.

 

2008: Managing partner of the DC office of the Brunswick Group, a London-based PR and communications strategy firm.

 

Formerly Washington Editor at Large for The Huffington Post and the online site's political director during the 2008 election and was President of a start up website, OurChart.com from 2006 to 2008.

 

Currently a partner in the political communications firm SKDKnickerbocker.

 

In short, Hilary Rosen is a highly privileged elitist of the type quite common in progressive circles, and her claim to be channeling the wants and needs of American womanhood is, in a word, risible. And that’s a laugh!


Posted by tmg110 at 3:38 PM EDT
Updated: Thursday, 12 April 2012 3:42 PM EDT
Post Comment | Permalink
Only 4,000 Enemies of the People?
Topic: Decline of the West

Incidentally, it appears that President Obama's millionaire/billionaire-bashing Buffet Rule, about which he's been making such a terrific fuss, would apply to no more than 4,000 taxpayers—this according a a Bloomberg analysis. I'd call that a sufficient commentary on the utter phoniness of Barry's class warfare campaign.


Posted by tmg110 at 9:03 AM EDT
Updated: Thursday, 12 April 2012 9:13 AM EDT
Post Comment | Permalink
Wednesday, 11 April 2012
Introducing Tom's Rule
Topic: Decline of the West

 

I was totally on board with New Jersey Governor Chris Christie when he advised Warren Buffet to just shut up about being under-taxed. As Christie pointed out, if Buffet thinks he’s not paying enough, there’s nothing to stop him from sending an additional check to the Department of the Treasury.

 

But then I had a brain wave. If it’s really true that the nation is full of guilt-ridden rich people like Buffet, why not give them an opportunity to soothe their consciences without dragging other people into a higher tax bracket?

 

Under Tom’s Rule, any taxpayer with an anticipated annual income of $1 million or more could opt to pay taxes at a higher rate by signing a Fair Tax Contract with the IRS. This contract would be valid for five years and would be renewable at the taxpayer’s option. If the taxpayer’s income should happen to fall below $1 million for any year during the term of the contract, the normal, non-contractual tax rate would apply instead. Contracting taxpayers would receive a Certificate of Appreciation, signed by the President and suitable for framing, plus a four-color FAIR TAX PATRIOT bumper sticker.

 

Newt Gingrich never had an idea this good!


Posted by tmg110 at 12:21 PM EDT
Updated: Thursday, 12 April 2012 9:01 AM EDT
Post Comment | Permalink
The Machinery of Murder (Part Two)
Topic: Must Read

 

Had he not been carried off by tuberculoses in 1950, George Orwell would have been 70 years old when Len Dighton’s Bomber was published. And I have no doubt that he’d have read the novel with interest, for one of its principal themes is class conflict in the wartime Royal Air Force.

 

Bomber makes few concessions to the rosy view of World War II as a heroic saga or a great crusade. Set in June 1943, it describes the progress of a Bomber Command raid on Germany over a period of twenty-four hours. Dighton, who served in the RAF in the late 1940s, has an eye for the small but convincing detail and an ear for the schoolboy jargon of the aircrew—many of them, as he notes, young men barely out of their teens. Some of these men are desperately tired, some are beginning to lose their nerve and all of them are aware that their chances of completing a tour of operations—thirty bombing missions—without being killed or wounded are slight.

 

Nor do the airmen of Dighton’s fictional bomber squadron constitute a band of brothers. Thanks to the peculiarities of the British class system, there exists a great divide between those who are commissioned officers and those who are enlisted personnel. In the US Army Air Force, all pilots, navigators and bombardiers in a bomber crew were officers. It was assumed that if you were qualified to perform such duties, you were qualified for a commission. Not so in the RAF, where a man could qualify as a pilot yet remain ineligible for a commission. The crew of Creaking Door, the Lancaster bomber that is the focus of the novel’s action, is composed entirely of enlisted men with the rank of sergeant. They regard most officers—their obsequious flight leader in particular—with narrow-eyed suspicion. For their part, many of the officers look down upon the enlisted aircrew as not quite proper chaps.

 

The raid itself, described by Dighton in great detail, goes badly wrong as a series of accidents and errors direct the attacking bombers away from their intended target—an industrial city in the Ruhr—toward a small, unimportant German town called Altgarten. Struck by 750 bombers, the town is utterly destroyed. (This fictional tragedy is based on several actual incidents, including the accidental bombing of a Czech insane asylum in 1943.)

 

Bomber portrays the Allied strategic bombing offensive as a simple campaign of mass murder—which of course it was. Having satisfied themselves that Germany’s cities and their populations were legitimate targets, the bomber barons set about destroying them with the single-minded fervor of true believers. Some Allied leaders, Churchill prominent among them, had doubts about area bombing but suppressed them. The airmen who flew the missions knew what they were doing and some experienced qualms, as does Flight Sergeant Lambert, Creaking Door’s pilot. But the machinery of murder rumbled on anyway, almost until the day of Germany’s surrender.

 

Orwell, touring Germany shortly after the war’s end, wrote that “To walk through the ruined cities of Germany is to feel an actual doubt about the continuity of civilisation.” In its painfully detailed, minute-by-minute reconstruction of the means by which those cities were destroyed, Bomber raises a similar doubt. To defeat Nazi Germany was no doubt an absolute necessity. But the price was high.


Posted by tmg110 at 10:29 AM EDT
Updated: Thursday, 11 April 2013 9:47 PM EDT
Post Comment | Permalink
Friday, 6 April 2012
The Machinery of Murder (Part One)
Topic: Must Read

 

Len Dighton’s masterpiece, Bomber, does not depict the Second World War in the manner to which we’ve become accustomed in these years of the glorification of the Greatest Generation. Published in 1970, long before the old soldiers began to fade away, this disturbing novel is ultimately based on one grim statistic: During World War II, the Allied strategic bombing offensive killed an estimated 400,000 German civilians, the majority of them in 1943-45.

 

The strategic bombing offensive against Germany was controversial at the time and remains so today. In the 1920s and 1930s, air power advocates confidently asserted that strategic bombing could rapidly destroy an enemy’s will and capacity to fight by smashing key industries and infrastructure and demoralizing the civilian population. British Prime Minister Stanley Baldwin famously asserted that “The bomber will always get through,” and the idea that the next war would begin with a knock-out blow from the air became firmly fixed in the popular imagination.

 

The doctrine of strategic bombing was enthusiastically embraced by the leaders of the Royal Air Force, which had been made an independent service in 1918. It justified the RAF’s existence and pointed toward a revolution in the art of war that would reduce the Army and Royal Navy to mere adjuncts of the main weapon, the Air.

 

There were dissenters from the concept of the strategic bombing, Winston Churchill prominent among them. And when war began in 1939 it quickly became apparent that the RAF possessed neither the expertise nor the technology to deliver the aerial knock-out blow. Daylight bombing raids resulted in high losses from German fighters and antiaircraft artillery (flak). Night bombing raids revealed that the RAF was pitifully ill-equipped to locate and bomb targets in darkness.

 

The Battle of Britain ought to have raised further doubts about the validity of strategic bombing. Despite all its advantages of numerical superiority and possession of bases in close proximity to targets in Britain, the Luftwaffe failed either to paralyze British industry or to demolish the morale of the British people. But with the fall of France, Britain stood alone against Nazi Germany. Winston Churchill, now prime minister, realized that strategic bombing was his country’s only means of striking back. Great resources were accordingly devoted to the creation of a bomber force capable of delivering on the promises of the interwar air power prophets. With the appointment of the able and energetic Air Marshal Sir Arthur Harris to lead it in 1941, RAF Bomber Command was transformed into a powerful weapon of mass destruction.

 

Along with Churchill’s scientific adviser, Lord Cherwell, Harris pressed for the adoption of area bombing by night. Germany’s cities were to be laid in ruins, the objective being to kill and “de-house” German civilians. Cherwell and Harris argued that industrial workers were valid military targets; anyhow, daylight precision bombing would only result in prohibitive casualties. Determined to take the fight to Germany in some way, Churchill fell in with their plan.

 

Between 1941 and 1943, new and far more capable aircraft, such as the Lancaster and Halifax four-engine bombers, were delivered to Bomber Command’s operational squadrons. New, sophisticated navigational aids were introduced. A specially trained Pathfinder Force was created to locate and mark targets for the bomber stream. By 1943 Bomber Command was a formidable force that posed a deadly threat to Germany’s cities. Meanwhile, the US Eighth Air Force, based in Britain, was adding its weight to the strategic air offensive with daylight bombing raids.

 

The Germans reacted to this threat with their customary efficiency and by 1943 they were devoting major resources to home air defense. Particularly impressive was the development of a specialized night fighter force. In tandem with the Luftwaffe’s always-efficient flak, radar-directed night fighters with their hard-hitting cannon armament took a heavy toll of RAF bombers.

 

Bomber is set in mid-1943, with both Bomber Command and the German night fighter force rising to peak efficiency and the killing about to begin in earnest. Having sketched in the historical background, I’ll discuss the novel in my next post.


Posted by tmg110 at 10:46 AM EDT
Updated: Friday, 6 April 2012 3:30 PM EDT
Post Comment | Permalink
Thursday, 5 April 2012
Misogynists for Obama Update
Topic: Decline of the West

 

As of today, the Obama super PAC (run by former Obama adviser Bill Burton) has still not returned the $1 million donation it received from the hideous misogynist, Bill Maher. Yet the President's standing with American women has improved of late, if recent polls are to be believed. What to make of it? I can only speculate that women who support Barry's reelection must be suffering from the political equivilent of battered wife syndrome.


Posted by tmg110 at 11:11 AM EDT
Updated: Thursday, 5 April 2012 11:18 AM EDT
Post Comment | Permalink
Wednesday, 4 April 2012
Supremely Stupid
Topic: Decline of the West

 

It was quite good fun to watch from the sidelines as President Obama—by his own assessment the most gifted and brilliant individual ever to occupy the American presidency—made a number of notably stupid statements regarding the powers of the federal judiciary.

 

Obama is understandably worried that the Supreme Court might strike down his signature achievement, Obamacare, in full or in part. Last week’s oral arguments certainly provided him with good grounds for apprehension. So what was his response? It came in two parts.

 

For starters, the president—who is, you’ll recall, a former law professor—asserted that Obamacare is constitutional because it should be constitutional. Careful observers no doubt noticed the circularity of this argument and perhaps the President himself realized that its logic was less than compelling. So he went on to say that it would be “unprecedented” for the “unelected” high court to strike down as unconstitutional a law passed by a “strong majority” of a "democratically elected" legislature.

 

 Unprecedented indeed, except for the two hundred-odd times that the Supreme Court has done so since Marbury v. Madison established the principle of judicial review in 1803.

 

This was a remarkably stupid thing for the President to say—but of course he thinks that most people are too stupid to notice when he’s lying. Or perhaps I’m judging him too harshly, unelected part-time pundit that I am. It could be that Obama was rattled by the course of the oral arguments and simply lashed out at the judiciary. It wouldn’t be the first time in the Age of Barry that a setback provoked such an adolescent temper tantrum.

 

The President is now trying to walk back his comments. (We're getting to the point where it would be useful to have a keyboard hot key that would type "Obama later explained" with one touch.) On reflection he must have realized that he’d said something that not only made him look dumb but risked antagonizing the justices. It would be just like our narcissistic philosopher-president to assume that other people will behave with same pettiness he displays on a daily basis.


Posted by tmg110 at 10:12 AM EDT
Post Comment | Permalink

Newer | Latest | Older