Blog Tools
Edit your Blog
Build a Blog
RSS Feed
View Profile
« June 2012 »
S M T W T F S
1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30
You are not logged in. Log in
Entries by Topic
All topics  «
Decline of the West
Freedom's Guardian
Liberal Fascism
Military History
Must Read
Politics & Elections
Scratchpad
The Box Office
The Media
Verse
Virtual Reality
My Web Presence
War Flags (Website)
Culture & the Arts
The New Criterion
Twenty-Six Letters
Saturday, 9 June 2012
Bob Berates the Peasants
Topic: Liberal Fascism

 

So how come the Left failed in its crusade to boot the fascist Governor of Wisconsin, Scott Walker, out of office? Just ask Bob Scheer! Writing for Nation of Change, he has an answer that’s sure to warm the hearts of the citizens of the Badger State:

 

The electorate in Wisconsin…tat voted Tuesday against public employee unions were not expressing a rational response to the crisis, but rather a tantrum stoked by the lavishly financed demagogues of the right. The voters bought their story because the opportunism of the Democratic Party leadership has left progressives without a believable alternative to the tea party’s narrative. Indeed, job creation became a bigger issue than collective bargaining in the Wisconsin race, and the dismal national unemployment figures that came out just days before the election didn’t hurt the Republicans’ cause.

 

Once again, the dumbasses in Flyover Country have crushed the hopes and dreams of coastal progressives—and in the home state of such leftie luminaries as “Fighting Bob” Lafollette, William Proxmire and Russ Feingold!

 

Feingold, incidentally, was better at reading the tea leaves than wise guys like Scheer: He declined to run against Scott Walker in the recall election. Not that the latter is completely wrong in his commentary. It’s quite true that the Democratic Party had no believable alternative to Walker’s policies. Milwaukee Mayor Tom Barrett’s candidacy was hobbled from the beginning by his inability to explain how he’d balance the state’s budget and boost its economy. It’s clear what Scheer wanted: a left-wing candidate standing on a radical platform, denouncing “Teabaggers,” “the extreme Right,” “greedy bankers,” “corporations,” etc. The likely result of such a campaign is not difficult to envision: an even more crushing Walker victory. But his diagnosis of the Democrats’ problem is spot on: no “believable alternative.”

 

Scheer is also correct when he points out that President Obama let the side down. And he’s understandably bitter about it:

 

[T]he president made two fundraising stops within 50 miles of the Wisconsin border last Friday, but studiously avoided entering the state he easily carried in the 2008 election. Instead of visiting, Obama tweeted: “It’s Election Day in Wisconsin tomorrow, and I’m standing by Tom Barrett. He’d make an outstanding governor. -bo.” Not a word of support for the unions that so slavishly support the president and spent millions propping up Barrett.

 

Angry contempt for the peasants and proles who failed to vote as required, dismay over a progressive president’s chicken-hearted punt—it isn’t easy being Bob!


Posted by tmg110 at 10:56 AM EDT
Post Comment | Permalink
Not So Hot?
Topic: Decline of the West

 

I’m always bemused by op-ed and news analysis pieces that tout the brilliance of a political campaign organization. Because when you think about it, doing right thing to do in the course of a campaign is just doing the obvious. Is the economy circling the drain? Then the challenger should hit the incumbent on the economy. Did the incumbent succeed in killing a high-profile enemy of the country? Then the incumbent should take credit for the kill. It’s really not that complicated.

 

So I’ve been somewhat surprised by the stumbling, fumbling, bumbling course of the Obama campaign so far. True, he’s embarking on a rocky, winding road to reelection—but is that any excuse for the series of unforced errors we’ve witnessed over the last couple of weeks? After the brilliant campaign that Team Obama ran in 2008, I and most observers certainly never expected such a string of unforced errors.

 

But maybe Team Obama was never all that brilliant. Maybe 2008 was a fluke. Maybe the combination of an economic downturn, a financial crisis, war weariness and an erratic Republican candidate paved Barack Obama’s Yellow Brick Road to the White House. Maybe today, in a much different political environment, we’re seeing what the candidate and his campaign are really made of: smoke, mirrors, shiny objects, wind and hot air.


Posted by tmg110 at 10:29 AM EDT
Post Comment | Permalink
Friday, 8 June 2012
Why Occupy?
Topic: Decline of the West

 

The Occupy movement has a long list of gripes, but it was apparent at a very early stage that one predominated: the ever-increasing burden of student debt. Unlike the movement’s adolescent whining about “capitalism,” “corporations,” “big banks,” etc., this is a genuine grievance. Young people are certainly entitled to ask why they had to borrow $25,000, $50,000 or more to obtain some basically worthless degree. True, they themselves bear a share of the responsibility for their plight, but it remains true that many college students got hosed by the higher education industry.

 

Over at the Huffington Post, Adrian Nazari has been blogging about the student loan bubble. Citing a recent study by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, he notes that the total student loan debt burden now exceeds $1 trillion, and that 27% of people with outstanding student loans have past-due balances. With the economy stalled and the job market weak, this problem is certain to get worse—worse even, perhaps than the housing bubble whose bursting caused the Great Recession.

 

Colleges and universities, of course, are sitting pretty. They’ve pocketed all that money and continue to demand more in the form of ever-increasing tuition and fees—secure in the knowlege that the public will blame government for the high cost of college. But something clearly has to give, and probably it will be the progressive fantasy that every person has the “right” to a college education.


Posted by tmg110 at 2:49 PM EDT
Post Comment | Permalink
First Anna Wintour...
Topic: Liberal Fascism

...and now this: "Links to Obama campaign show fashion industry’s political clout is growing"

 Remember now: Mitt Romney is some out-of-touch white guy who just doesn't connect with Mr. & Mrs. Average American. Why, he wouldn't know a Vera Wang from a Tracy Reese!


Posted by tmg110 at 2:19 PM EDT
Updated: Friday, 8 June 2012 2:24 PM EDT
Post Comment | Permalink
Big Labor's Waterloo?
Topic: Decline of the West

 

Well worth reading: Charles Krauthammer in the Washington Post, on the significance of the Wisconsin recall election:

 

Tuesday, June 5, 2012, will be remembered as the beginning of the long decline of the public-sector union. It will follow, and parallel, the shrinking of private-sector unions, now down to less than 7 percent of American workers. The abject failure of the unions to recall Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker (R)—the first such failure in U.S. history—marks the Icarus moment of government-union power. Wax wings melted, there’s nowhere to go but down.

 

Krauthammer notes that the real, though necessarily unspoken, objective of the unions was to rescind the one Walker reform that was, for them, the kiss of death: elimination of automatic collection of union dues. Before Act 10, the state collected dues on behalf of the unions by deducting them from employees’ paychecks. No more. Now it’s up to employees to decide whether they want to belong to a union and pay dues. The result? Well, to take a single example, since the passage of Act 10 AFSCME, the second-largest public-sector union in Wisconsin, has lost more than half of its membership.

 

Can the public-sector unions mount an effective counteroffensive against this wave of conservative reform? Perhaps, but the outcome of the recall election in Wisconsin inclines me to think that their future is bleak.


Posted by tmg110 at 8:32 AM EDT
Post Comment | Permalink
New Frontiers in Pocket Change
Topic: Liberal Fascism

 

Here’s a sob story for you: “Indentured Servitude for Seniors: Social Security Garnished for Student Debts.”

 

This gut-wrenching tale of woe comes from a column by Ellen Brown in the online leftie squealer, Nation of Change:

 

 I’m a 68 year old grandma of 2 young grandchildren. I went to college to upgrade my employment status in 1998 or 1999. I finished in 2000 and at that time had a student loan balance of about 3500.00. Could not find a job and had to request forbearance to carry me. Over the years I forgot about the loan, dealt with poor health, had brain surgery in 2006 and the collection agents decided to collect for the loan in 2008.

 

At no time during the 6-7 year gap did anyone remind me or let me know that I could make a minimum payment on the loan. Now that I am on Social Security (have been since I was 62), they have decided to garnishee [sic] my SS check to the tune of 15%.

 

I have not been employed since 2004 and have the two dependents . . . .  I don’t dispute that I owed them the $3500.00 but am wondering why they let it build up to somewhere around $17,000/20,000 before they attempted to collect.

 

Toss out the wet hankies and what left of this story?  She borrowed $3,500 to go to college at the ridiculous age of 56. After graduating and discovering that she’d simply been wasting her time, this woman blew off the $3,500 debt. Over the years she “forgot about it,” see? Now she’s whining because the lending institution wants its money—plus accumulated interest and penalties. Well, isn’t that too bad!

 

Lest you condemn me as a stony-hearted bastard, I will say that the lending institution would be well advised on both compassionate and pragmatic grounds to settle her debt for less than $20,000. Let’s say $7,500, just to make the point that there ain’t no free lunch.

 

Don’t tell that to Ms. Brown, though. Here’s her solution to the senior citizen student debt problem:

 

Estimates are that tuition could be provided free to students for a mere $30 billion annually.  The government has the power to find $30 billion -- or $300 billion or $3 trillion -- in the same place the Federal Reserve found it: it can simply issue the money.

 

Congress is empowered by the Constitution to “coin money” and “regulate the value thereof,” and no limit is set on the face amount of the coins it creates. It could issue a few one-billion dollar coins, deposit them in an account, and start writing checks.

 

How can you parody progressivism when it so perfectly parodies itself?


Posted by tmg110 at 7:59 AM EDT
Updated: Friday, 8 June 2012 8:04 AM EDT
Post Comment | Permalink
Thursday, 7 June 2012
Bloody Summer in Normandy
Topic: Freedom's Guardian

I forgot to note that yesterday, June 6, was the anniversary of D-Day. But that oversight had its upside, for it caused me reflect on the fact that June 6 was merely the first day of the battle for Normandy, which stretched into August of 1944. The story of that battle—one of the most decisive in world history—is well told by Max Hastings in Overlord: D-Day and the Battle for Normandy (1985). Highly recommended.


Posted by tmg110 at 8:14 AM EDT
Post Comment | Permalink
Wednesday, 6 June 2012
How Walker Won in Wisconsin
Topic: Decline of the West

 

The flip side of the Left’s debacle in Wisconsin is the story of Governor Scott Walker’s impressive victory. How did he do it? There were several factors:

 

First, Walker beat the Left at its own ground game. With an assist from the National Republican Party and conservative donors, he was able to mobilize a highly effective get-out-the-vote drive. This more or less negated the unions’ on-the-ground organization.

 

Second, the Walker campaign’s financial advantage enabled it to dominate the airwaves. The national Democratic Party’s reluctance to chip in for Barrett reinforced the incumbent’s advantage.

 

Third, Walker was able to campaign on a proven record of success. Voters in Wisconsin—even some who’d opposed him initially—could see that his reforms had indeed staved off a serious crisis in state finances while avoiding large-scale layoffs of teachers and other government employees. They could also see that the state’s economy was beginning to improve.

 

Fourth, never underestimate the significance of character. Walker kept his cool throughout the recall campaign and refused to be baited. He came across as a low-key, reasonable guy. Thus the Left’s over-the-top attacks, e.g. cries that he was a “Tea Party rock star” and the darling of the radical right, failed to make much impression. Walker’s unflappability served him well.


Posted by tmg110 at 12:54 PM EDT
Post Comment | Permalink
Ray Bradbury, 1920-2012
Topic: Must Read

 

Sad news: American author Ray Bradbury has died at the age of 91.


Posted by tmg110 at 11:29 AM EDT
Updated: Wednesday, 6 June 2012 11:34 AM EDT
Post Comment | Permalink
They're Taking It Well
Topic: Liberal Fascism

 

Sample Tweet from a distraught progressive, reacting to the outcome of the Wisconsin recall election: “Someone from the NRA should shoot Scott Walker in the head, GTA-style.”

 

Much more here.

 

Meanwhile, DNC Chairperson Debbie Wasserman Schultz took to Twitter to wag a cautionary finger: “Despite the disappointing outcome, #WIrecall effort sent Scott Walker a message that his brand of divisive politics is offensive & wrong.”

 

Absolutely, Debbie. Maybe someone will “Lincoln his ass.” That should drive the message home.


Posted by tmg110 at 10:11 AM EDT
Updated: Wednesday, 6 June 2012 10:13 AM EDT
Post Comment | Permalink

Newer | Latest | Older