Topic: Decline of the West
Today is a day of remembrance. In various ways, in various places, Americans mourn the dead of September 11, 2001—truly a date that will live in infamy. They commemorate the heroism shown by police officers, firefighters, paramedics, and others on that terrible day. And they honor the service of those who took up the fight against the brutal enemy who so grievously wounded our country. All this is fitting and proper.
But we should also remember those who greeted 9/11 with malicious satisfaction. Most of them, of course, were the usual suspects: the declared enemies of Great Satan. More than a few of them, though, were our fellow Americans: people who decried displays of patriotism, crafted apologia for Islamofascist terror and denounced the President of the United States as a fascist, a war criminal, etc. These Americans complied a record of dishonor and betrayal that whether we like it or not is also part of the memory of 9/11.
Take the novelist Barbara Kingsolver. Here’s how she reacted to 9/11 and its aftermath:My daughter came home from kindergarten and announced, “Tomorrow we all have to wear red, white and blue.”
“Why?” I asked, trying not to sound wary.
“For all the people that died when the airplanes hit the buildings.”
I fear the sound of saber-rattling, dread that not just my taxes but even my children are being dragged to the cause of death in the wake of death. I asked quietly, “Why not wear black, then? Why the colors of the flag, what does that mean?”
“It means we're a country. Just all people together.”
So we sent her to school in red, white and blue, because it felt to her like something she could do to help people who are hurting. And because my wise husband put a hand on my arm and said, “You can't let hateful people steal the flag from us.”
This on September 25, 2001, while the rubble was still smoking.
Then there was Professor Ward Churchill, a celebrated Native American activist who opined in 2003 that the people killedd in the fall of the Twin Towers were “little Eichmanns” who got what was coming. It’s pleasant to record that the attention Churchill attracted to himself with this nasty little sneer cost him his job. It turned out that his claim to be a Native American was false and that much of his scholarship was either bogus or plagiarized. For this Churchill was booted from his position at the University of Colorado. But later on Naomi Wolf cited him as a victim of Bush Administration fascism in her lunatic book, The End of America. Wolf argued that George W. Bush and his cabal were literal fascists, following the Hitler playbook in an effort to bring National Socialism to America. This demented screed received rave reviews.
Michael Moore’s contribution was a clumsy piece of agitprop, Fahrenheit 9/11, the quality of which can be gauged by the adolescent faux-cleverness of its title. Though dedicated to a friend of Moore who was killed by the Islamofascists on 9/11, the film concentrates all its bile on the President of the United States, playing out a string of implausible conspiracy theories and plain lies. Fahrenheit 9/11’s Washington DC premiere was attended by a gaggle of Democratic members of Congress with a grinning Nancy Pelosi at its head.
The antiwar movement that burgeoned in the wake of 9/11 soon surpassed that of the Vietnam era in the viciousness of its anti-Americanism. Demonstrations routinely featured signs and chants calling for the death of President Bush. Others called upon US troops to mutiny: WE SUPPORT THE TROOPS WHEN THEY SHOOT THEIR OFFICERS. Particularly loathsome was the movement’s exploitation of Cindy Sheehan, the mother of a US soldier killed in action in Iraq. Sheehan, a long-time left-wing activist was clearly a kook. (When the Army sent troops to New Orleans after Hurricane Katrina, she showed up to demand an end to the “military occupation” of the city.) But she was also the mother of a dead soldier, so the movement christened her “Mother Sheehan” and tried to make her into an antiwar symbol. To see her on TV, raving and ranting about the evils of George W. Bush and American imperialism, was truly painful. How could anyone with a heart have let her make such a spectacle of herself?
Now of course the Bush Administration was and is open to criticism on many counts. The wars in both in Afghanistan and Iraq were badly mismanaged. The case for the attack on Iraq was allowed to rest on Saddam Hussein’s possession of weapons of mass destruction and when no such weapons were found the blow to US prestige was a heavy one. Moreover, having made these military commitments the President and his people seemed curiously reticent about mobilizing the country for war. To the charges of their increasingly shrill and bitter critics they made no effective reply. Nor did the leadership of the US military cover itself with glory.
But right from the beginning, the Left in this country rejected the proposition that the United States, having been attacked, had the right to strike back against its enemies. Ward Churchill, stealing a line from Malcolm X, said that on 9/11 the chickens had come home to roost and many on the Left echoed him. Sometimes the anti-Americanism of the antiwar activists descended into farce, as when they objected to airdrops of food to Afghan civilians at the time of the US invasion. They claimed to fear that the pallets might fall on Afghan children and kill them! They also argued that the rations being supplied were unsuitable for Muslims—as if that would have made a difference to starving people. To them as to our formal enemies America was the Great Satan: wrong on every count, everywhere, all the time.
As noted in connection with Michael Moore, the venom of the hard Left came to poison conventional politics. Initially the Democratic Party, shocked by the events of 9/11, rallied behind the Bush Administration. But soon enough they repented of that and a little later supposedly respectable figures like Senator Dick Durban of Illinois were heard comparing the US military to the Waffen-SS.
The excesses of the antiwar mob and of those who allowed themselves to be influenced by it were justified with the claim that dissent is the highest form of patriotism. The sincerity of this claim can be judged by its absence in the Age of Obama. Many of the people who claimed the title of patriot by reviling Bush call the critics of Obama disloyal and even treasonous. In this small matter as in the great issues of our times, the bad faith of the Barbara Kingsolvers, Ward Churchills, Naomi Wolfs, Michael Moores, Noam Chomskys of the world is revealed. They and those like them well deserve to be called out on this solemn day of remembrance.