Blog Tools
Edit your Blog
Build a Blog
RSS Feed
View Profile
« March 2012 »
S M T W T F S
1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30 31
You are not logged in. Log in
Entries by Topic
All topics  «
Decline of the West
Freedom's Guardian
Liberal Fascism
Military History
Must Read
Politics & Elections
Scratchpad
The Box Office
The Media
Verse
Virtual Reality
My Web Presence
War Flags (Website)
Culture & the Arts
The New Criterion
Twenty-Six Letters
Wednesday, 14 March 2012
Misogynists for Obama Update
Topic: Decline of the West

 

As of this morning the Obama super PAC (run by former Obama adviser Bill Burton) has still not returned the $1 million donation it received from the leering misogynist, Bill Maher. There’s hopeful news, however! It seems that Obama hatchet man David Axelrod, who was slated to appear on the slimeball’s HBO show, “Real Time with Bill Maher,” has suddenly discovered a scheduling conflict. Though I doubt that a goon like Axelrod would have found Maher’s obscene slurs objectionable, he’s obviously leery of associating the Obama campaign with Mr. Misogynist. But there’s still the question of that $1 million donation…


Posted by tmg110 at 12:08 PM EDT
Post Comment | Permalink
The Aspidistra Flies Again
Topic: Must Read

 

In an earlier post I mentioned that I’d acquired the Everyman’s Library volume containing three early novels by George Orwell: Burmese Days, Keep the Aspidistra Flying and Coming Up for Air. A couple of evenings ago I finished rereading Keep the Aspidistra Flying.

 

I was struck by how up-to-date this novel seemed, though it was written and is set in mid-1930s Britain. This was mainly due to two elements of the plot:

 

(1) Keep the Aspidistra Flying’s protagonist, Gordon Comstock, is a rather moth-eaten thirtysomething poet who is struggling to avoid falling into the money-trap—which is how he thinks of regular employment, marriage and family, home ownership, etc. Gordon is determined to live outside the world of money. But alas, he finds poverty to be something of a trial and at one point he's hectored by his family into taking a job at an advertising agency. There Gordon finds to his surprise and dismay that he has prodigious abilities in the copywriting line. Ultimately he must choose between poetry/poverty and advertising/prosperity. For anyone who has ever worked on the creative side of advertising, Orwell's depiction of Gordon’s agency, the New Albion, will seem very familiar indeed. And his mordant observation that advertising is nothing more than “the rattling of a stick inside a swill-bucket” will surely strike a chord.

 

(2) The plot device that drives the novel to its climax is the unplanned pregnancy of Gordon’s girlfriend, Rosemary. Living in squalor on subsistence wages, Gordon cannot support Rosemary and the child, and so the question of abortion comes up. After a visit to the public library, where he reads up on the development of the fetus and examines some pictures of same, Gordon rejects the option of abortion—which Rosemary was willing to endure if need be. Instead they agree to marry, and Gordon returns to a “respectable” job in advertising. Once again, and despite decades of pro-abortion propagandizing, this struck me as a realistic contemporary situation—far more realistic, indeed, than the smile-button view of abortion that’s promoted by the pro-choice mob.

 

Orwell has something of a somber reputation, and the good-natured, tolerant attitude of Keep the Aspidistra Flying may come as a surprise to some readers. He remains for me one of the most interesting writers of the twentieth century—for his political prophecy and also for his rare appreciation of the ordinary, the dutiful and the stiff upper lip.


Posted by tmg110 at 11:53 AM EDT
Post Comment | Permalink
Tuesday, 13 March 2012
Culture of Death Update
Topic: Liberal Fascism

 

I’ve always been a bit suspicious of people who describe themselves as “medical ethicists.” What exactly are the qualifications for that job? And what do they do all day? Writing in the Weekly Standard, Andrew Ferguson answers my questions:

 

They are happily employed by pharmaceutical companies, hospitals, and other outposts of the vast medical-industrial combine, where their job is to advise the boss to go ahead and do what he was going to do anyway (“Put it on the market!” “Pull the plug on the geezer!”). They also attend conferences where they take turns sitting on panels talking with one another and then sitting in the audience watching panels of other medical ethicists talking with one another. Their professional specialty is the “thought experiment,” which is the best kind of experiment because you don’t have to buy test tubes or leave the office. And sometimes they get jobs at universities, teaching other people to become ethicists. It is a cozy, happy world they live in.

 

And in that cozy, happy world, they spend a good deal of their time dreaming up alibis for such things as partial-birth abortion and—get this—“after-birth abortion.” In plain language, that means killing a newborn baby.

 

Ferguson’s article details the “thought experiment” performed by Alberto Giubilini and Francesca Minerva, two Australian medical ethicists, whose conclusions about “after-birth abortion” were presented in the Journal of Medical Ethics. “When circumstances occur after birth such that they would have justified abortion,” they write, “what we call after-birth abortion should be permissible.”

 

In other words, a woman’s right to an abortion includes the right to have her newborn baby killed after its birth, if it has a disability or even if she changes her mind about motherhood. Since the “circumstances…that justify abortion” boil down to the woman’s “right to choose,” it logically follows that women possess this power of life and death as an inalienable human right. And besides, a newborn baby doesn’t really understand that it’s being deprived of its life…

 

Progressivism has been called “the party of death.” To the extent that progressives tolerate such views from people pretending to talk about ethics, it’s an accurate description.


Posted by tmg110 at 8:05 AM EDT
Updated: Wednesday, 14 March 2012 8:28 AM EDT
Post Comment | Permalink
Breaking the Silence
Topic: Decline of the West

 

My first instinct was to mock this story: Hillary Clinton: 'I've Made Women a Cornerstone of American Foreign Policy'

 

Really, it sounds like so much feminist claptrap—and consider the source! But on reflection, I decided that the Secretary of State deserves at least a modest kudo. Though her rhetoric is typically squishy, replete with such Newspeak words and terms as “reproductive rights,” Clinton is drawing attention to the world’s number-one human rights issue: the oppression of women. Unfortunately, she’s not doing so in the strident terms with which the nineteenth-century abolitionists denounced slavery, which is what injustice on this scale calls for. Not only as a diplomat but also as a postmodern, nonjudgmental liberal, Hillary Clinton is ill equipped to shine the spotlight of truth on agents of female oppression like the Islamofascists. But even her soft and hesitant words constitute an improvement over the silence with which Western feminists have for the most part passed over this huge and hideous global crisis.


Posted by tmg110 at 7:34 AM EDT
Post Comment | Permalink
Misogynists for Obama Update
Topic: Decline of the West

And speaking of the odious Bill Maher, as of this morning the Obama super PAC (run by former Obama adviser Bill Burton) has still not returned the $1 million donation it received from the unrepentant misogynist.


Posted by tmg110 at 7:16 AM EDT
Post Comment | Permalink
Barry Bashes Sarah
Topic: Decline of the West

 

Via Commentary: Team Obama is now running against Sarah Palin—who isn't running.

 

No, really, Alana Goodman details the Obama campaign's strategy in this blog post. I tend to agree with her that launching an attack ad against a political opponent who isn’t actually running against you is a sign of desperation—or least of a campaign that lacks a positive message, as in “Here’s why you should reelect me.” On the other hand, this attack on Sarah Palin may have something to do with the rising influence of misogynist-in-chief Bill Maher, who contributed $1 million the Obama reelection effort. I haven’t seen the ad, so I don’t know if it refers to the former Alaska governor as a “dumb twat.”


Posted by tmg110 at 6:54 AM EDT
Post Comment | Permalink
Monday, 12 March 2012
With Friends Like This...
Topic: Decline of the West

 

This story caught my eye, and the lede cracked me up:

 

BERKELEY, Calif.— Nation of Islam minister Louis Farrakhan delivered a speech to hundreds at the University of California Berkeley Saturday and some students took issue with parts of his message.

 

Imagine that! A racist, anti-Semetic, hate-spewing kook makes a speech at a major American university—and some students had the politically incorrect audacity to find his remarks objectionable!

 

In a speech to the Afrikan Black Coalition Conference (note the “k” in “Afrikan,” incidentally—very trendy!), “Minister” Farrakhan opined that the wicked Jews control the the American government and media. Needless to say, some students, Jews particularly, found this statement disturbing. Perhaps they recalled Hitler’s characterization of thre Weimar regime as the “Jew Republic.”

That the University of California Berkeley tolerates the presence on campus of a horrific racist like Farrakhan is dispiriting enough. Worse still, however, was the rauturous response he received from black students. “What I got out of it was how we as black students can take our education and utilize it to build the black community back up," one said. How’s that? By launching a pogrom against the Jews? As long as the black community accepts a truly evil person like Farrakhan as its spokesman and champion, it will never escape the abyss of poverty and failure in which it is mired. Such attitudes do have consequences.


Posted by tmg110 at 9:51 AM EDT
Updated: Monday, 12 March 2012 3:47 PM EDT
Post Comment | Permalink
Sunday, 11 March 2012
Misogynists for Obama Update
Topic: Decline of the West

As of this morning the Obama super PAC (run by former Obama adviser Bill Burton) has still not returned the $1 million donation it received from the repulsive misogynist, Bill Maher. In a recent interview, Burton explained that it's OK for the Obama campaign to take Maher's money because he's just a "comedian." So now we know that in the view of Team Obama, a comedian who calls a woman a "dumb twat" or a "cunt" is a respectable citizen. They're taking his money, aren't they?


Posted by tmg110 at 4:16 PM EST
Post Comment | Permalink
Saturday, 10 March 2012
The Gay Misogynist
Topic: Decline of the West

 

You know who just about everybody failed to mention during the white-heat phase of the Limbaugh/Fluke/disgusting misogynist dustup? Andrew Sullivan. I was thinking about all the vile things that Maher and similar lowlifes had said about Sarah Palin—and I remembered Sullivan’s creepy, not to say demented obsession with her pregnancy. For months, he promoted the literally and figuratively incredible claim that Palin had not actually given birth to her son trig. No, no, it was actually Palin’s daughter Bristol who was pregnant, and Palin, who was Governor of Alaska at the time only pretended to be pregnant so as to avoid having her family values image tarnished by an out-of-wedlock birth. Or something. See here for a sample of Sullivan’s Trig Palin “commentary.” Aside from being hateful, it’s truly weird.

 

Now it seems to me that Sullivan’s obsessive raving and ranting about Sarah Palin’s pregnancy was actually worse that Maher’s string of offhand obscenities: It just went on and on and on. If this isn’t a prime example of misogyny, what is? I realize of course that progressives would angrily reject the proposition that Sullivan, a homosexual, could be guilty of any type of bigotry. Lucky Andrew, he belongs to one of the officially designated mascot groups of the Left. But over here in reality land we're honor-bound to expose Sullivan’s hateful, woman-bashing craziness, and pronounce the anathema upon him accordingly.


Posted by tmg110 at 5:50 PM EST
Updated: Sunday, 11 March 2012 10:10 AM EST
Post Comment | Permalink
The Real Scandal
Topic: Decline of the West

 

One thing that seems to have fallen through the cracks in the course of the uproar over Sandra Fluke, Rush Limbaugh and (of course) the “Republican War on Women” is the shocking revelation that the cost of sex in America is skyrocketing. And no, I don’t mean the average hourly cost of a prostitute’s services or the bill for dinner at a good restaurant. I mean the cost of birth control. You may recall that according to Ms. Fluke, it’s costing her a cool $3,000 to stay protected during sex while she attends law school. Now that is an outrage to rival the sky-high cost of college tuition!

 

Of course, if Ms. Fluke can’t afford the high cost of sex, it begs a question: Can society afford to underwrite the sex lives of the women of America?. Let’s see, call it a grand a year per sexually active woman times the total number of same and we could be talking about one hell of a budget buster!


Posted by tmg110 at 1:45 PM EST
Updated: Saturday, 10 March 2012 1:51 PM EST
Post Comment | Permalink

Newer | Latest | Older